Open Access

Cytochrome P450 2B6 genetic variants are associated with plasma nevirapine levels and clinical response in HIV-1 infected Kenyan women: a prospective cohort study

  • Margaret Ngwono Oluka1Email author,
  • Faith Apolot Okalebo1,
  • Anastasia Nkatha Guantai1,
  • R Scott McClelland2 and
  • Susan M Graham2
AIDS Research and Therapy201512:10

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-015-0052-0

Received: 14 January 2015

Accepted: 25 March 2015

Published: 15 April 2015

Abstract

Background

Polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 2B6 (CYP2B6) affect the steady state plasma concentration of nevirapine. CYP2B6 516G>T and 983T>C are common in African populations, but data on their influence on plasma nevirapine concentration and clinical response in African women are limited. We investigated the impact of CYP 516G>T and 983T>C on plasma nevirapine concentration and clinical outcomes in a prospective cohort study of HIV-infected Kenyan women.

Methods

Study subjects were 66 HIV-1-seropositive women taking nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy. Plasma collected at week 12 was analyzed for nevirapine concentration by high performance liquid chromatography. Baseline samples were genotyped for CYP2B6 516G>T and 983T>C single nucleotide polymorphisms by real-time polymerase chain reaction. CD4 cell count, plasma viral load, and genotypic drug resistance in plasma and genital secretions were assessed at baseline and during follow up. We evaluated the effect of each genotype on plasma nevirapine concentration at week 12 and on change in CD4 cell count at months 3, 6 and 12. Associations between plasma nevirapine concentration and clinical outcomes were analyzed by logistic or linear regression.

Results

Women with CYP2B6 516TT genotype (n=9) had higher mean nevirapine plasma levels (14.33 μg/mL) compared to those with heterozygous 516GT (9.18 μg/mL; n=25) and wild- type 516GG (7.95 μg/mL; n=32) genotypes (P=0.01). Women heterozygous for the CYP2B6 983TC genotype (n=13) had higher mean nevirapine plasma levels (12.94 μg/mL), compared to women with the homozygous 983TT (8.35 μg/mL; n=53) genotype (P=0.007). In Generalized Estimating Equation analysis, plasma nevirapine levels predicted greater change in CD4 cell count after ART initiation (adjusted beta 119.4 cells/μL, 95% CI, 27.3–211.5 cells/μL, P=0.01). The CYP2B6 983TT genotype also predicted greater change in CD4 cell count (adjusted beta 68.6 cells/μL, 95% CI, 3.9–133.4 cells/μL, P=0.04). We found no associations between CYP2B6 genotypes and virologic response or toxicity.

Conclusions

CYP2B6 516G>T and CYP2B6 983T>C genotypes were strongly associated with plasma nevirapine concentration, which predicted immunologic response in women on nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy. These data support continued work on the potential utility of human genetic testing to inform nevirapine dosage optimization for individual patients.

Keywords

CYP2B6 Pharmacogenetics Nevirapine HIV infection Antiretroviral therapy Women

Background

Sub-Saharan Africa remains severely affected by HIV, accounting for 69% of people living with HIV worldwide [1]. The HIV epidemic in Kenya disproportionately affects women, with prevalence (8.0%) nearly twice that of men (4.3%) [2]. This difference is reflected in the large number of women accessing HIV care and treatment with antiretroviral drugs [3]. Over 70% of patients on first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Kenya take a nevirapine-based regimen [3,4]. This is due to its relatively low cost, manageable pill burden and excellent efficacy [5]. However, the use of nevirapine is limited by a potentially fatal immune-mediated hypersensitivity reaction that manifests as hepatotoxicity, fever, and/or skin rash,[6] and by a fragile genetic barrier to the development of drug resistance [7]. Furthermore, not all patients treated with nevirapine experience optimal response. The etiology of sub-optimal response is multi-factorial and may include differences in adherence, gender, concomitant medications and genes responsible for drug metabolism [8,9].

Nevirapine undergoes oxidative metabolism primarily by cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and 2B6 (CYP2B6), with a minor contribution by 3A5 (CYP3A5) [10,11]. CYP2B6 metabolic activity is subject to the influence of several genetic polymorphisms, as well as strong inhibitors and inducers, contributing to highly variable plasma drug exposure [12-14]. CYP2B6 genetic polymorphisms may be more important in African populations. For example, the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) CYP2B6 516G>T (rs3745274), which reduces hepatic CYP2B6 protein expression and activity [15], occurs more frequently in African populations than in Caucasian and Asian populations [16-18]. Moreover, CYP2B6 983T>C (rs28399499), which is a null allele [12], is absent in Caucasians but has a prevalence of 4%–11% in African populations [18,19].

Nevirapine exhibits large inter-individual variability in its pharmacokinetics [20], contributing to variable outcomes among HIV-infected patients. Sub-therapeutic plasma concentrations are associated with treatment failure and the emergence of antiretroviral drug resistance, whereas supra-therapeutic concentrations are associated with toxicity [21]. Several studies have evaluated associations between CYP2B6 516G>T and CYP2B6 983T>C SNPs and steady-state plasma nevirapine levels [22-24]. However, prospective studies evaluating the influence of CYP2B6 polymorphisms on clinical response among HIV-infected African women taking nevirapine-based ART are lacking.

In the present study, we investigated the impact of CYP2B6 516G>T and CYP2B6 983T>C genetic variants on plasma nevirapine levels and clinical outcomes including change in CD4 cell count, plasma viral load (PVL), and the incidence of antiretroviral resistance mutations and adverse reactions.

Results

Baseline characteristics and plasma nevirapine levels

Sixty-nine of the 73 women screened met the inclusion criteria and were tested for CYP2B6 genotypes. Four women who had not been prescribed a nevirapine-based regimen for at least 12 weeks were excluded from analysis. Baseline characteristics of study participants at ART initiation are shown in Table 1. The median age at ART initiation was 36 (inter-quartile range [IQR] 32–40) and the median CD4 count was 126 cells/μL (IQR 79–154 cells/μL). Abnormal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and skin rash were each present in 11 (16%) of the women at baseline. No baseline plasma or genital drug resistance was detected.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of study participants at initiation of nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy

Characteristic

Median (IQR) or N (%)

Age (yrs)

36 (32–40)

Weight (kg)

65 (54 – 70)

BMI (kg/m2)

25.0 (22.3 – 28.2)

CD4 cell count (cells/μL)

126 (79 – 154)

Plasma viral load (log10 copies/mL)

5.54 (5.17 – 5.90)

Cervical viral load (log10 copies/mL)

4.04 (3.42 – 4.60)

ALT levels (>ULN)

11 (15.9)

Skin rash

11 (15.9)

Plasma resistance (present)

0

Genital resistance (present)

0

ART regimen: d4T/3TC/NVP

69 (100)

BMI = body mass index, ALT = alanine aminotransferase, ULN = upper limit of normal, ART = antiretroviral therapy, NVP = nevirapine, d4T = stavudine, 3TC = lamivudine.

Sixty-six of the 69 women in this study had detectable nevirapine levels at week 12. Three women who had undetectable levels were assumed to be non-adherent and were excluded from further analysis. Steady-state plasma nevirapine levels were characterized by wide inter-individual variability, ranging from 1.68 μg/mL to 23.12 μg/mL (median 9.14 μg/mL, IQR 5.98–2.46 μg/mL). No significant correlation was found between log10-transformed plasma nevirapine levels and age (P=0.78) or body mass index (BMI, P=0.19).

Frequency of CYP2B6 genotypes

For the CYP2B6 516G>T SNP, the frequency of the T variant allele was 31.2% (95% CI, 23.6%–39.6%). The number of subjects with GG, GT and TT genotypes were 35 (50.7%), 25 (36.2%), and 9 (13.0%), respectively. For the CYP2B6 983T>C SNP, the frequency of the C variant allele was 10.1% (95% CI, 5.7%–16.4%). Most individuals (55 or 79.9%) had the homozygous wild type TT genotype, whereas 14 women (20.3%) had the heterozygous mutant TC genotype and none had the homozygous mutant CC genotype. CYP2B6 516G>T polymorphism met Hardy-Weinberg (HW) equilibrium expectations (P=0.26). HW equilibrium could not be tested for CYP2B6 983T>C, because the homozygous mutant was not detected in this population. There was no evidence of linkage disequilibrium between rs3745274 and rs28399499 (Fisher’s exact P=0.45). In terms of inferred phenotypes, 26 (37.7%) individuals were predicted to be extensive metabolizers, 31 (44.9%) to be intermediate metabolizers, and 12 (17.4%) to be slow metabolizers.

CYP2B6 516G>T and 983T>C genotypes and plasma nevirapine levels

Among the 66 women with detectable plasma nevirapine levels, CYP2B6 516G>T and 983T>C SNPs were associated with higher mean plasma nevirapine levels at week 12 (Table 2). A gene-dose effect was evident in the distribution of plasma nevirapine levels among CYP2B6 516G>T and CYP2B6 983T>C genotypes. Mean plasma nevirapine levels were higher among individuals who were homozygous for the mutation (CYP2B6 516TT, 14.33 μg/mL) and in those who were heterozygous for the mutation (CYP2B6 516GT, 9.18 μg/mL) compared to those with the wild-type (CYP2B6 516GG, 7.95 μg/mL, P=0.01 across groups).
Table 2

CYP2B6 516G>T and 983T>C genotypes and plasma nevirapine concentrations

CYP2B6

N (%)

Plasma nevirapine

P value

concentration (μg/mL),

geometric mean (95% CI)

CYP2B6 516G>T

 GG

32 (48.5)

7.95 (6.59-9.60)

 

 GT

25 (37.9)

9.18 (7.52-11.20)

 

 TT

9 (13.0)

14.33 (9.94-20.67)

 

TOTAL

66

 

0.01*

CYP2B6 983T>C

 TT

53 (80.3)

8.35 (7.33-9.64)

 

 TC

13 (19.7)

12.94 (10.11-16.56)

 

 CC

0

  

TOTAL

66

 

0.007*

Phenotypes

 Extensive metabolizers

24 (36.4)

6.92 (5.70-8.41)

 

 Intermediate metabolizers

30 (45.5)

9.34 (7.78-11.20)

0.02†

 Slow metabolizers

12 (18.2)

14.76 (11.38-19.19)

<0.0001†

TOTAL

66

  

*Comparison across groups using Stata’s qtlsnp command.

†ANOVA comparing either intermediate or slow metabolizers to extensive metabolizers (reference category).

A similar trend was observed for CYP2B6 983T>C, with mean plasma nevirapine levels being higher among individuals expressing the heterozygous genotype (CYP2B6 983TC, 12.94 μg/mL) compared to those with the homozygous wild-type (983TT, 8.35 μg/mL, P=0.01 across groups). With regard to the phenotypes, mean plasma nevirapine levels were higher among individuals classified as slow metabolizers (14.76 μg/mL, P < 0.01 compared to extensive metabolizers) and among individuals classified as intermediate metabolizers (9.34 μg/mL, P=0.02 compared to extensive metabolizers). The relationships between log10-transformed plasma nevirapine concentrations and CYP2B6 genotypes or phenotypes are summarized in Figures 1a, b and c.
Figure 1

Differences in log 10 -transformed plasma nevirapine levels by genotype. Panel A, Log10-transformed plasma nevirapine levels for each CYP2B6 516G>T genotype: GG, GT, and TT. Panel B, Log10-transformed plasma nevirapine levels for each CYP2B6 983T>C genotype: TC and TT. Panel C, Log10-transformed plasma nevirapine levels for each CYP2B6 phenotype (predicted from CYP2B6 516G>T and 983T>C genotypes). EM = extensive metabolizer, IM = intermediate metabolizer, SM = slow metabolizer.

Plasma nevirapine levels predicted greater change in CD4 cell count

Higher plasma nevirapine levels were significantly correlated with greater change in CD4 cell count from baseline to month 3 (P=0.02) and month 6 (P=0.02), but not month 12 (P=0.07). In Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) analysis with adjustment for baseline CD4 cell count, month since ART initiation, and time-updated adherence by pill count, plasma nevirapine levels predicted greater change in CD4 cell count after ART initiation (adjusted beta 119.4 cells/μL, 95% CI, 27.3 to 211.5 cells/μL, P=0.01).

CYP2B6 983T>C genotype was associated with greater change in CD4 cell count

There was no difference in CD4 cell count at baseline between the two CYP2B6 983T>C genotype groups (mean 120 for TC, mean 123 for TT, p=0.88). Using Stata’s qtlsnp command, CYP2B6 983T>C genotypes were associated with mean change in CD4 cell count at month 3 (P=0.01), month 6 (P=0.02) and month 12 (P=0.02). In GEE analysis with adjustment for baseline CD4 cell count, month since ART initiation, and time-updated adherence by pill count, the TT genotype predicted greater change in CD4 cell count (adjusted beta 68.6 cells/μL, 95% CI, 3.9 to 133.4 cells/μL, P=0.04) during follow-up (Table 3). Adjustment for log10-transformed plasma nevirapine level diminished this effect, as shown in the last column of Table 3.
Table 3

CYP2B6 983T>C genotype and change in CD4 cell count over the 12-month follow-up period

Variable

Unadjusted beta

P value

Adjusted beta*

P value

Adjusted beta†

P value

CYP2B6 983T>C

  

 TT genotype

reference

 

reference

 

reference

 

 TC genotype

68.2 (3.3 to 133.0)

0.039

68.6 (3.9 to 133.4)

0.038

57.6 (−4.6 to 119.8)

0.069

Baseline CD4 count

0.0 (−0.4 to 0.5)

0.920

0.0 (−0.4 to 0.4)

0.831

0.1 (−0.3 to 0.5)

0.595

Months since ART initiation

3.3 (0.8 to 5.8)

0.010

3.4 (1.0 to 5.8)

0.005

3.6 (1.1 to 6.0)

0.004

Pill count adherence

0.3 (−1.6 to 2.1)

0.768

0.8 (−1.0 to 2.5)

0.384

0.7 (−1.4 to 2.8)

0.521

Log10-tranformed nevirapine levels

115.3 (26.6 to 204.1)

0.011

  

85.9 (10.6 to 161.3)

0.025

*Adjusted for all factors included in model.

†With added adjustment for log10 plasma nevirapine levels.

There were no differences between baseline CD4 cell count for the three CYP2B6 516G>T genotype groups (mean 127 for GG, 108 for GT, and 142 for TT, p=0.26). Interestingly, CYP2B6 516G>T genotypes had no significant effect on the mean change in CD4 cell count at month 3 (P=0.86), month 6 (P=0.61), or month 12 (P=0.54) in this population. This lack of effect was confirmed in a GEE model (results not shown).

No correlation between plasma nevirapine levels and virologic response

There were no correlations between plasma nevirapine levels and change in PVL at month 3 (P=0.95), month 6 (P=0.53), or month 12 (P=0.81). In GEE analysis with adjustment for baseline PVL, month since ART initiation, and time-updated adherence by pill count, no association between plasma nevirapine levels and change in PVL was found (data not shown). T test comparisons showed no associations between plasma nevirapine levels and viral suppresion at month 3 (P=0.38), month 6 (P=0.59), or month 12 (P=0.45). In GEE analysis with adjustment for baseline PVL, month since ART initiation, and time-updated adherence by pill count, there was no association between plasma nevirapine levels and viral suppression (data not shown).

Genotypic resistance was not detected in plasma or genital secretions of study participants at baseline. During follow-up, four (5.8%) and three (4.4%) women developed genotypic resistance in plasma and in genital secretions, respectively. Plasma nevirapine levels were not associated with resistance in either plasma (odds ratio [OR] 0.55, 95% CI 0.004–81.94, P=0.81) or genital tract secretions (OR 3.94, 95% CI 0.006–2497.02, P=0.68). Adjustment for baseline CD4 cell count and adherence or for baseline PVL and adherence did not change these findings.

Plasma nevirapine levels did not predict hepatotoxicity or skin rash

Of the 69 study participants, 11 (15.9%) had abnormal ALT levels at baseline which persisted through follow-up. Of the 58 women who had normal ALT levels at baseline, 14 (24.1%) had abnormal ALT levels that developed during follow-up. Plasma nevirapine levels were not significantly associated with the development of hepatotoxicity during follow-up, despite an increased odds (OR 5.35, 95% CI 0.27–106.01, P=0.27). Adjustment for adherence, hepatitis B, and baseline CD4 count did not change this result (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.88, 95% CI 0.13–62.95, P=0.50). No correlation was found between plasma nevirapine levels and maximum ALT levels recorded during ART (ρ=0.129, P=0.30, Figure 2). Eleven (15.9%) of the 69 study participants had a skin rash at baseline that persisted over the follow-up period. Of the 58 women with no skin rash at baseline, 27 (46.6%) developed skin rash during follow-up. Plasma nevirapine levels were not associated with a new skin rash (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.03–3.88, P=0.40). Adjustment for adherence and baseline CD4 count did not change these results (aOR 0.44, 95% CI 0.03–5.97, P=0.54).
Figure 2

Scatterplot of log 10 -transformed plasma nevirapine levels and log 10 -transformed maximum ALT levels during ART.

Discussion

This prospective study analyzed the association between CYP2B6 516G>T and CYP2B6 983T>C genotypes, plasma nevirapine levels, and clinical response in a well-characterized cohort of HIV-1-positive Kenyan women on first-line nevirapine-based ART. The prevalence of CYP2B6 516T and CYP2B6 983C variants in this population was similar to that reported for other African populations and Kenyan ethnic groups [17,18]. We observed a significant association between both CYP2B6 516G>T and CYP2B6 983T>T genotypes and higher plasma nevirapine concentrations. In addition, plasma nevirapine levels significantly predicted change in CD4 cell counts after ART initiation. Furthermore, CYP2B6 983TC heterozygosity was associated with greater increase in CD4 cell count over the 12-month follow-up period.

CYP2B6 983T>C occurs predominantly in African subjects, with allele frequencies of 4% to 11% [19,20]. Homozygosity for the mutant allele CYP2B6 983 CC was not detected in this population, in concurrence with a previous study [25]. However, heterozygosity for the mutation CYP2B6 983TC was associated with higher plasma nevirapine levels in our study, with heterozygous TC individuals having levels 55% higher than those with the wild type TT. This effect is noteworthy for its magnitude, especially when compared to the smaller effect observed for CYP2B6 516GT (16%). The CYP2B6 983T>C (rs28399499) SNP results in the variant protein CYP2B6*18 with an I328T as the only amino acid change. Its expression in vitro results in no detectable protein or activity [26], and it has been designated as a null allele [12]. This null status could explain the greater impact of CYP2B6 983TC compared to the CYP2B6 516GT. In agreement with our results, other studies have reported that CYP2B6 983TC heterozygosity leads to reduction in nevirapine clearance [27,28].

We also made an observation that heterozygosity for CYP2B6 983TC was significantly associated with greater increase in CD4 cell count during follow-up. This observation could be attributed to the fact that CYP2B6 983TC was associated with higher plasma nevirapine levels, which in turn were associated with greater increase in CD4 cell count, particularly in the early months of ART. In fact, from our multivariable analysis, the addition of plasma nevirapine levels to the model weakened the association between genotype and change in CD4 cell count, providing evidence of at least partial mediation of this association by nevirapine levels.

Previous studies evaluating the impact of CYP2B6 genotypes on clinical outcomes have reported varied results. A study by Haas et al. [29] reported no association between CYP2B6 516G>T genotypes and change in CD4 cell count, in concurrence with our findings. However, in a HIV-1-positive pediatric cohort, CYP2B6 516TT genotype was associated with greater increase in CD4 cell count percentage at week 12, compared to those with the GT and GG genotypes (9.0% vs. 5.0% vs. 3.2% increases, respectively) [30]. More recent studies report a significant association between the CYP2B6 516 T allele, UGT2B7*2, higher efavirenz plasma levels and change in CD4 cell count in HIV-1 positive African patients in Tanzania and Ethiopia [31]. These studies did not include testing for CYP2B6 983T>C. Hence, our study is the first to report a significant association between CYP2B6 983TC heterozygosity and greater increase in CD4 cell count in an African population.

It is unclear why nevirapine concentrations would influence CD4 cell recovery but not have a detectable effect on viral load reduction or suppression. At least one study of patients with virologic suppression on nevirapine has highlighted nevirapine’s ability to penetrate reservoir sites and achieve high intracellular concentrations, leading to extremely low levels of viral replication [32]. It is possible that penetration into reservoir sites varied by genotype in this study, leading to an impact on CD4 T cell recovery that was independent of the effect on plasma viral load. Alternatively, because most women achieved virologic suppression and there were no differences in baseline plasma viral load prior to ART initiation, there may have been a floor effect on change in plasma viral load that reduced our power to detect differences by genotype. In contrast, our study participants initiated therapy with very low CD4 counts which increased during ART and reached no ceiling during the 12 months of follow-up. We may, therefore, have had more power to detect differences in CD4 cell recovery. A third explanation is that some other genetic trait linked to the CYP2B6 983T>C phenotype somehow influences CD4 T cell recovery. This is a potential area of investigation, should our results be confirmed in other studies.

A major strength of our study was its design as a prospective study in a well-characterized cohort in which clinical outcomes were carefully measured and recorded. Our study also had a number of limitations. First, sub-optimal adherence could have contributed to the observed wide inter-patient variability in plasma nevirapine levels. Second, plasma nevirapine levels could also be under the influence of other drug metabolism and membrane transporter genes which were not studied in our cohort. Third, we do not have information on nutritional status, herbal remedies, or medications obtained outside the research clinic that may have influenced immune response. Fourth, our sample size and duration of follow-up were limited, and we may have failed to detect smaller differences in some outcomes. Despite these limitations, we were able to identify several clinical correlates that were associated with participant genotypes.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we have found in this study that CYP2B6 516G>T and 983T>C genotypes are associated with higher plasma nevirapine exposure in HIV-1 infected Kenyan women, and that higher plasma nevirapine levels and the CYP2B6 983TC genotype were associated with better immunologic response. In this study, neither plasma nevirapine levels nor CYP2B6 genotypes were significantly associated with toxicity or with the emergence of plasma or genital resistance. However, our follow-up time was limited and the incidence of both toxicity and drug resistance was fairly low. We recommend further studies to confirm the role of CYP2B6 genotypes and other relevant genes in the pharmacokinetics and clinical response to nevirapine in HIV-1-positive African women.

Methods

Study population and design

The study was nested within an ongoing prospective cohort study investigating the impact of ART on HIV-1 infectivity in female sex workers in Mombasa, Kenya [33,34]. At the time of this study, ART was initiated for women with CD4 counts ≤200 cells/μL or an AIDS defining illness [35]. Pregnant women were excluded and instead referred to programs offering ART for the prevention of mother to child transmission. Women requiring rifampicin-containing treatment for active tuberculosis were prescribed efavirenz or a triple non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor regimen, according to WHO guidance at the time [35]. All women were prescribed co-trimoxazole prophylaxis, unless contraindicated.

The standard ART regimen included nevirapine 200 mg daily for 14 days, then 200 mg twice daily [35]. The NRTI backbone included stavudine or zidovudine plus lamivudine at standard doses [35]. Adherence was promoted by directly observed administration of one of the two daily doses to the women on weekdays during their first month of ART. Pill box organizers and a monthly support group were also used to enhance adherence, which was monitored at each visit by pill count and a validated visual analogue scale [36]. Fluconazole, which can impact nevirapine levels, was prescribed for only one woman in this study, starting at the month 6 visit.

Clinical response to treatment was monitored, including self-reported symptoms and physical examination (including rash). Laboratory testing, including regular testing of CD4 cell count, hemoglobin, ALT, creatinine, and plasma and genital viral load, were performed on stored samples from baseline, month 3, month 6, and month 12 [33,34]. Samples with detectable HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) after treatment initiation were evaluated for antiretroviral resistance mutations.

All HIV-1-seropositive women who initiated nevirapine-based ART between May 2005 and September 2007 and had stored peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and plasma collected at week 12 of ART were included in this study. Women in the parent ART cohort gave consent at enrollment for long-term storage of samples and for additional studies including genetic testing. The present study was approved as a protocol modification by the University of Washington Human Subjects Research Committee and Kenya Medical Research Institute’s Ethics and Research Committee.

Determination of plasma nevirapine levels

Blood plasma collected 10–14 weeks after ART initiation was used for the determination of plasma nevirapine concentrations. Blood collection was not timed in relation to medication dosing, since this pharmacological study was a secondary use of stored samples and data. However, most women attended clinic in the morning, and are likely to have been sampled between 2 and 4 hours after pill ingestion, at an optimal sampling time for nevirapine [37]. Plasma nevirapine concentrations were quantified using a reversed phase high performance liquid chromatographic method adapted from the method of Minzi and Ngaimisi [38]. Calibration curves obtained for nevirapine-spiked plasma samples were linear, with correlation coefficients (r2) in the range of 0.993–0.996 and a limit of quantitation of 0.86 μg/mL. The intra-day and inter-day precision (CV%) ranged from 6.08–7.96 and 4.72–7.32, respectively. Intra-day and inter-day accuracy (RD%) ranged from 3.47–5.51 and 2.00–8.10, respectively. The mean recovery for low, medium and high concentrations of nevirapine was in the range of 96–110%.

DNA preparation and genotyping procedures

DNA was extracted from PBMCs using the QIAamp DNA blood mini-kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The extracted DNA was quantified using a UV spectrophotometer ND-1000 (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA) at 260 nm and normalized to a concentration of 20 ng/mL. Genotyping was carried out on an ABI 7500 Fast Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). SNPs were analyzed using the validated Taqman Genotyping Assays purchased from Applied Biosystems for CYP2B6 516G>T (rs3745274; assay ID C_7817765_60) and CYP2B6 983T>C (rs28399499; assay ID C_60732328_20), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Definitions

CYP2B6 516G>T and 983T>C genotypes were described as homozygous wild type for the G or T alleles (516GG or 983TT), heterozygous (516GT or 983TC), or homozygous mutated (516TT, 983CC). CYP2B6 metabolic phenotypes were inferred from composite CYP2B6 genotypes as previously described [22]. Those with no variant alleles at either positions (516GG or 983TT) were classified as “extensive metabolizers.” The term “intermediate metabolizers” described those with a single variant allele at either position, but not both. The term “slow metabolizers” described those with two variant alleles (516TT, 983CC, or 516GT with 983TC).

Changes in CD4 cell count and PVL were assessed at months 3, 6, and 12. Viral suppression was defined as <100 copies HIV-1 RNA per mL of plasma. Hepatotoxicity potentially attributable to ART was defined as a normal ALT at baseline with an elevation above the upper limit of normal during treatment. A possible ART-related skin rash was defined as no rash at baseline followed by rash during treatment. Plasma or genital drug resistance was defined as identification of drug resistance mutations in plasma or genital secretions before or during treatment.

Data analysis

The prevalence of each genetic variant was estimated from the total number of copies of individual alleles divided by the number of all alleles in the study population. Deviation of genotypes from HW equilibrium expectation was estimated using Stata’s hwsnp command, which calculates an exact HW significance probability. Prevalence estimates were reported with exact binomial confidence intervals. Steady-state plasma nevirapine levels were tested for normality by the Shapiro-Wilk test, and subsequently log10-transformed due to lack of normality. All averages are hence presented as the geometric mean. Women with undetectable levels of nevirapine were excluded from analysis, because it was assumed that they were non-adherent to treatment.

One-way analysis of variance was used to determine whether there were significant differences in continuous variables across genotype or phenotypes groups. The effects of each genotype or phenotype on plasma nevirapine levels at week 12 and on change in CD4 cell count at month 3, 6 and 12 were evaluated using Stata’s qtlsnp command, which assumes a co-dominant genetic model and tests for an additive effect, a dominant effect and that both effects are equal to zero (this last comparison is equivalent to comparing means across the three possible genotypes and phenotypes). We also modeled the relationship between plasma nevirapine levels and post-ART outcomes including change in CD4 count, plasma viral load, and viral suppression using GEE models with a logit or identify link, independent correlation matrix, and robust standard error estimates. We adjusted these models for month since ART initiation, time-updated adherence by pill count, and either baseline CD4 count or plasma viral load, as appropriate. To determine whether plasma nevirapine levels acted as a mediator in the association between CYP2B6 983T>C genotype and change in CD4 cell count, the effect of adding log10-transformed plasma nevirapine levels to multivariable modeling was also evaluated by GEE analysis.

The correlation between log10-transformed plasma nevirapine levels and age, BMI, change in CD4 cell count, and change in log10-transformed PVL at months 3, 6 and 12 was evaluated with the Pearson’s test for correlation. An independent t test was used to compare log10-transformed nevirapine levels in women with suppressed versus unsuppressed PVL. Logistic regression was used to test for associations between log10-transformed plasma nevirapine levels and the development of ALT elevation, skin rash, or plasma or genital drug resistance after treatment initiation. The modeled binary outcomes were adjusted for potential confounding factors appropriate to the outcome being evaluated. In the analysis of hepatotoxicity, the presence of hepatitis B infection was included in the model as a potential effect modifier. Data were analyzed using Stata version 11.2 (Stata Corp, College Station, Texas, USA).

Abbreviations

ALT: 

Alanine aminotransferase

AOR: 

Adjusted odds ratio

ART: 

Antiretroviral therapy

BMI: 

Body mass index

CI: 

Confidence intervals

CYP2B6: 

Cytochrome P450 2B6

CYP3A4: 

Cytochrome P450 3A4

CYP3A5: 

Cytochrome P450 3A5

GEE: 

Generalized estimating equation

HW: 

Hardy-Weinberg

IQR: 

Inter-quartile range

OR: 

Odds ratio

PBMC: 

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells

PVL: 

Plasma viral load

RNA: 

Ribonucleic acid

SNP: 

Single nucleotide polymorphism

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the research staff, particularly Daniel Juma Siminyu (Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacognosy, University of Nairobi) and Godfrey Anyona (Government Chemists) for their contributions towards drug level analysis, the Mombasa Municipal Council for clinical space, and the Coast Provincial General Hospital for laboratory space. Special thanks go to our study participants. This work was supported by the University of Washington’s Royalty Research Fund and by National Institutes of Health (NIH) [AI-58698, AI-38518, and AI-069990 to SMG]. Additional support for the Mombasa Field Site was provided by the University of Washington Center for AIDS Research, an NIH-funded program [P30 AI027757].

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacognosy, University of Nairobi
(2)
Departments of Medicine, Global Health, and Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA and Institute of Tropical and Infectious Diseases, University of Nairobi

References

  1. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. UNAIDS Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.Google Scholar
  2. National AIDS and STI Control Programme. Kenya AIDS Indicator Survey 2012: Preliminary Report. Nairobi: Ministry of Health; 2013.Google Scholar
  3. National AIDS Control Council and National AIDS and STI Control Programme. Kenya AIDS Epidemic Update. Nairobi: Ministry of Health; 2012.Google Scholar
  4. Braitstein P, Ayuo P, Mwangi A, Wools-Kaloustian K, Musick B, Siika A, et al. Sustainability of first-line antiretroviral regimens: findings from a large HIV treatment program in western Kenya. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;53:254–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Foreman C, Gazzard B, Johnson M, Sharott P, Collins S. Maintaining cost-effective access to antiretroviral drug therapy through a collaborative approach to drug procurement, consensus treatment guidelines and regular audit: the experience of London HIV commissioners and providers. Sex Transm Infect. 2012;88:112–5.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dong BJ, Zheng Y, Hughes MD, Frymoyer A, Verotta D, Lizak P, et al. Nevirapine pharmacokinetics and risk of rash and hepatitis among HIV-infected sub-Saharan African women. AIDS. 2012;26:833–41.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ngo-Giang-Huong N, Jourdain G, Amzal B, Sang-a-gad P, Lertkoonalak R, Eiamsirikit N, et al. Resistance patterns selected by nevirapine vs efavirenz in HIV-infected patients failing first-line antiretroviral treatment: a Bayesian analysis. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27427.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Darwich L, Esteve A, Ruiz L, Bellido R, Clotet B, Martinez-Picado J. Variability in the plasma concentration of efavirenz and nevirapine is associated with genotypic resistance after treatment interruption. Antivir Ther. 2008;13:945–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Khienprasit N, Chaiwarith R, Sirisanthana T, Supparatpinyo K. Incidence and risk factors of antiretroviral treatment failure in treatment-naïve HIV-infected patients at Chiang Mai University Hospital, Thailand. AIDS Res Ther. 2011;8:42.Google Scholar
  10. Riska P, Lamson M, MacGregor T, Sabo J, Hattox S, Pav J, et al. Disposition and biotransformation of the antiretroviral drug nevirapine in humans. Drug Metab Dispos. 1999;27:895–901.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Erickson DA, Mather G, Trager WF, Levy RH, Keirns JJ. Characterization of the in vitro biotransformation of the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitor nevirapine by human hepatic cytochromes P-450. Drug Metab Dispos. 1999;27:1488–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Klein K, Lang T, Saussele T, Barbosa-Sicard E, Schunck WH, Eichelbaum M, et al. Genetic variability of CYP2B6 in populations of African and Asian origin: allele frequencies, novel functional variants, and possible implications for anti-HIV therapy with efavirenz. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2005;15:861–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ngaimisi E, Mugusi S, Minzi OM, Sasi P, Riedel KD, Suda A, et al. Long-term efavirenz autoinduction and its effect on plasma exposure in HIV patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;88:676–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Habtewold A, Amogne W, Makonnen E, Yimer G, Riedel KD, Ueda N, et al. Long-term effect of efavirenz autoinduction on plasma/peripheral blood mononuclear cell drug exposure and CD4 count is influenced by UGT2B7 and CYP2B6 genotypes among HIV patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66:2350–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lang T, Klein K, Fischer J, Nüssler AK, Neuhaus P, Hofmann U, et al. Extensive genetic polymorphism in the human CYP2B6 gene with impact on expression and function in human liver. Pharmacogenetics. 2001;11:399–415.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Haas DW, Ribaudo HJ, Kim RB, Tierney C, Wilkinson GR, Gulick RM, et al. Pharmacogenetics of Efavirenz and central nervous system side effects: an adult AIDS clinical trials group study. AIDS. 2004;18:2391–400.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Matimba A, Oluka MN, Ebeshi BU, Sayi J, Bolaji OO, Guantai AN, et al. Establishment of a biobank and pharmacogenetics database of African populations. Eur J Hum Genet. 2008;16:780–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Li J, Menard V, Benish RL, Jurevic RJ, Guillemette C, Stoneking M, et al. Worldwide variation in human drug-metabolism enzyme genes CYP2B6 and UGT2B7: implications for HIV/AIDS treatment. Pharmacogenomics. 2012;13:555–70.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mehlotra RK, Bockarie MJ, Zimmerman PA. CYP2B6 983T>C polymorphism is prevalent in West Africa but absent in Papua New Guinea: implications for HIV/AIDS treatment. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;64:391–5.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Dahri K, Ensom MH. Efavirenz and nevirapine in HIV-1 infection: is there a role for clinical pharmacokinetic monitoring? Clin Pharmacokinet. 2007;46:109–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Duong M, Buisson M, Peytavin G, Kohli E, Piroth L, Martha B, et al. Low trough plasma concentrations of nevirapine associated with virologic rebounds in HIV-infected patients who switched from protease inhibitors. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39:603–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Haas DW, Gebretsadik T, Mayo G, Menon UN, Acosta EP, Shintani A, et al. Associations between CYP2B6 polymorphisms and pharmacokinetics after a single dose of nevirapine or efavirenz in African Americans. J Infect Dis. 2009;199:872–80.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gozalo C, Gérard L, Loiseau P, Morand-Joubert L, Peytavin G, Molina JM, et al. ANRS 081 Study Group. Pharmacogenetics of toxicity, plasma trough concentration and treatment outcome with nevirapine-containing regimen in anti-retroviral-naïve HIV-infected adults: an exploratory study of the TRIANON ANRS 081 trial. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2011;109:513–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Heil SG, van der Ende ME, Schenk PW, van der Heiden I, Lindemans J, Burger D, et al. Associations between ABCB1, CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2D6, and CYP3A5 alleles in relation to efavirenz and nevirapine pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected individuals. Ther Drug Monit. 2012;34:153–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mahungu T, Smith C, Turner F, Egan D, Youle M, Johnson M, et al. Cytochrome P450 2B6 516G–>T is associated with plasma concentrations of nevirapine at both 200 mg twice daily and 400 mg once daily in an ethnically diverse population. HIV Med. 2009;10:310–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Honda M, Muroi Y, Tamaki Y, Saigusa D, Suzuki N, Tomioka Y, et al. Functional characterization of CYP2B6 allelic variants in demethylation of antimalarial artemether. Drug Metab Dispos. 2011;39:1860–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wyen C, Hendra H, Vogel M, Hoffmann C, Knechten H, Brockmeyer NH, et al. German Competence Network for HIV/AIDS. Impact of CYP2B6 983T>C polymorphism on non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor plasma concentrations in HIV-infected patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;61:914–8.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Schipani A, Wyen C, Mahungu T, Hendra H, Egan D, Siccardi M, et al. Integration of population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics: an aid to optimal nevirapine dose selection in HIV-infected individuals. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66:1332–9.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Haas DW, Smeaton LM, Shafer RW, Robbins GK, Morse GD, Labbe L, et al. Pharmacogenetics of long-term responses to antiretroviral regimens containing Efavirenz and/or Nelfinavir: an adult aids clinical trials group study. J Infect Dis. 2005;192:1931–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Saitoh A, Sarles E, Capparelli E, Aweeka F, Kovacs A, Burchett SK, et al. CYP2B6 genetic variants are associated with nevirapine pharmacokinetics and clinical response in HIV-1-infected children. AIDS. 2007;21:2191–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ngaimisi E, Habtewold A, Minzi O, Makonnen E, Mugusi S, Amogne W, et al. Importance of ethnicity, CYP2B6 and ABCB1 genotype for efavirenz pharmacokinetics and treatment outcomes: a parallel-group prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan Africa populations. PLoS One. 2013;8:e67946.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Haïm-Boukobza S, Morand-Joubert L, Flandre P, Valin N, Fourati S, Sayon S, et al. Higher efficacy of nevirapine than efavirenz to achieve HIV-1 plasma viral load below 1 copy/ml. AIDS. 2011;25:341–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Graham SM, Masese L, Gitau R, Jalalian-Lechak Z, Richardson BA, Peshu N, et al. Antiretroviral adherence and development of drug resistance are the strongest predictors of genital HIV-1 shedding among women initiating treatment. J Infec Dis. 2010;202:1538–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Graham SM, Jalalian-Lechak Z, Shafi J, Chohan V, Deya RW, Jaoko W, et al. Antiretroviral treatment interruptions predict female genital shedding of genotypically resistant HIV-1 RNA. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;60:511–8.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. National AIDS and STI Control Programme. Guidelines for Antiretroviral Therapy in Kenya. 3rd ed. Nairobi: Ministry of Health; 2005.Google Scholar
  36. Oyugi JH, Byakika-Tusiime J, Charlebois ED, Kityo C, Mugerwa R, Mugyenyi P, et al. Multiple validated measures of adherence indicate high levels of adherence to generic HIV antiretroviral therapy in a resource-limited setting. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;36:1100–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Veldkamp AI, van Heeswijk RP, Mulder JW, Meenhorst PL, Hoetelmans RM, Lange JM, et al. Limited sampling strategies for the estimation of the systemic exposure to the HIV-1 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor nevirapine. Ther Drug Monit. 2001;23:606–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Minzi OMS, Ngaimisi E. Bioanalytical method for determination of nevirapine in-vivo in resource constrained laboratories. J Chem Pharm Res. 2010;2:431–9.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Oluka et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement