Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Review
  • Open Access

Frailty in people living with HIV

AIDS Research and Therapy201815:19

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-018-0210-2

  • Received: 9 July 2018
  • Accepted: 9 November 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

The life expectancy of people living with HIV (PLHIV) has dramatically improved with effective and well-tolerated antiretroviral therapy. This presents a new challenge in caring for this patient population, with up to 28% of older PLHIV being identified as frail. Studies suggest that the prevalence of frailty is higher in PLHIV compared to the general population, and that the onset of frailty occurs at an earlier age. Frail individuals often present with multiple and non-specific health complaints, fluctuating disability, falls and delirium, and are at higher risk for multiple adverse outcomes, post-operative complications, poor responses to vaccination and functional decline. They tend to require longer hospital admissions, are more likely to require nursing home care, and are at greater risk of mortality. The degree of frailty can fluctuate over time. Limited evidence exists to support the reversal of frailty, but epidemiological evidence suggests that interventions to assess and manage co-morbidities, reducing risk factors such as smoking, increasing exercise and optimising BMI, and improving personal and community resources, are all likely to reduce the risk of frailty. Physicians who care for PLHIV need to recognise and manage frailty in this patient population. This includes an understanding of: when to intervene aggressively in the management of an older patient with a new HIV diagnosis to delay or prevent permanent debility and frailty; when to acknowledge that the patient has become frail; and the role of geriatric medicine in addressing the specific issues and needs of this patient, such as maximising functional ability, preventing falls, reducing social isolation and improving quality of life.

Keywords

  • HIV
  • Frailty
  • Ageing
  • Comorbidities

Background

Due to the success of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in extending the lifespan of people living with HIV (PLHIV), and the reduction in incident HIV infections, the cohort of PLHIV has been gradually ageing and the median age is approaching 50 in most Western clinics [1]. As a result, frailty has increasingly become an issue of concern for those who manage patients with HIV.

Increasing evidence suggests that whilst PLHIV do not age prematurely, concerns regarding frailty normally seen in a geriatric population can often be observed in patients with HIV a decade or more earlier [2, 3]. In addition, the prevalence of comorbidities, multi-morbidity and frailty is higher in PLHIV than the general population at all ages, and the gap between the two populations widens with age [46].

Several factors predispose PLHIV to higher rates of frailty, including the effects of chronic inflammation from HIV (even with complete plasma virological suppression), the toxic effects of earlier antiretroviral regimens, delayed initiation of therapy for HIV, higher rates of multi-morbidity (the presence of two or more chronic medical conditions) and co-infection, HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder, lifestyle factors such as smoking, and poverty and social isolation [7].

Definition of frailty

There is redundancy in living systems that allows for loss of function that can be compensated for, which can be measured by deficit accumulation. Accumulation of deficits over time predisposes an individual to the development of frailty [8]. Frailty has been defined as an increased vulnerability to stressors due to a lack of reserve and reduced ability to compensate for disruptions to homeostasis [8]. Frailty demonstrates that biological age may vary at the same chronological age.

There are 3 different ways of defining frailty:
  1. 1.

    As a clinical syndrome or phenotype, defined by Fried et al. [9].

     
  2. 2.

    Through the subjective opinion of the clinician.

     
  3. 3.

    Using multidimensional risk state or frailty index (FI) [10, 11].

     

Fried phenotype of frailty

The Fried phenotype of frailty is defined as three or more of five parameters: [9].
  1. 1.

    Unintentional weight loss of more than 10 lbs in the previous year.

     
  2. 2.

    Self-reported exhaustion.

     
  3. 3.

    Weak grip strength.

     
  4. 4.

    Slow walking speed.

     
  5. 5.

    Reduced physical activity.

     

Patients with one or two of these characteristics are classified as ‘pre-frail’ [9].

The Fried definition of frailty has clinical coherency and reproducibility, and includes sarcopenia and its pathophysiological manifestations in its characterisation of frailty. However, it doesn’t account for neurocognitive and psychosocial aspects of frailty and relies on performance-based tests [9].

Subjective opinion

Subjective assessment of biological age and frailty that considers appearance, mobility and communication can have a good inter-rater correlation [12]. A seven-stage clinical frailty scale ranging from very fit to severely frail was established by Rockwood et al. and this correlated with outcomes of institutionalisation and survival [13]. These subjective assessments have limited generalisability and depend on the training, and geriatric experience and expertise of the observer.

Frailty index

The FI developed by Rockwood and Mitnitski is based on the concept of frailty as an accumulation of deficits [10]. The quantity of deficits that accumulate over a person’s lifetime can be scored and higher numbers are associated with increasing likelihood of frailty. The deficits include defined symptoms, signs, diseases, disabilities and laboratory markers [10]. Deficits accumulate with age, are associated with adverse outcomes, occur across different domains, and can be measured over time [11].

FI figures correlate closely across countries, accumulate at a rate of approximately 3% per annum in the community, and are strongly correlated with mortality [14]. Ageing-associated adverse outcomes of decreased quality of life, increased hospitalisation and risk of death correlate more closely with the FI than with the phenotypic characterisation of frailty [15] or with chronological age [16].

Pathophysiology of frailty

Frailty is associated with inflammation. It is unclear whether inflammation drives frailty, is a compensatory mechanism that occurs with frailty, or is an epiphenomenon [17]. A number of immunological and physiological impairments combine to increase the risk of frailty. Ongoing inflammation is a feature of HIV infection, despite plasma virological suppression with ART [18, 19]. A number of immunological and pathophysiological impairments that are found in ageing are also found in those with chronic HIV infection and combine to increase the risk of frailty [18, 19].

The immunological features of ageing and frailty consist of immunosenescence, immune activation and increased levels of circulating cytokines (C-reactive protein [CRP], tumour necrosis factor alpha [TNF-α], interleukin-6 [IL-6]) [20, 21]. Chronic cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, which is common in PLHIV, may cause clonal expansion leading to immunosenescence, as well as causing immune activation and inflammation [22]. The role of chronic CMV in frailty has not been determined.

Physiological dysregulation associated with frailty was identified in the Women’s Health in Ageing Studies I and II (WHAS). Anaemia, inflammation, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), dehydroepiandrosterone-sulphate (DHEA-S), haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), micronutrients, adiposity and fine-motor speed were associated with a non-linear increase in frailty [23].

Mitochondrial loss from telomere shortening with ageing [24], and the effects of nucleoside analogue antiretrovirals used in the treatment of HIV [25], may also contribute to frailty by causing sarcopenia. Polypharmacy is also associated with a higher frailty risk in older people [26].

Characteristics of and risk factors for frailty

Frail individuals often present with multiple and non-specific health complaints, fluctuating disability, falls and delirium, and are at higher risk for multiple adverse outcomes, including post-operative complications, poor responses to vaccination and functional decline. They tend to require longer hospital admissions, are more likely to require nursing home care, and are at greater risk of mortality [8].

Known risk factors for frailty include chronic kidney disease [27], cerebrovascular disease [28], cardiovascular disease [29] and smoking [30, 31], while increased exercise has a protective association with frailty [32]. Risk for frailty increases at both high and low BMI—those with BMI between 25 and 29.9 had the lowest FI scores and lowest prevalence of Fried frailty [33]. Social factors such as personal wealth and neighbourhood resources also impact frailty risk [34], and those with frailty in lower-income countries that have fewer resources have substantially higher rates of mortality [35].

HIV infection has also been associated with frailty using the Fried phenotype and FI [36, 37].

Frailty in the HIV setting

Large, observational cohorts of HIV patients that measure ART use, clinical progress and development of co-morbidities have been useful in understanding associations with HIV infection, including the association between HIV and frailty.

The multicenter AIDS cohort study (MACS) defined frailty as three of: unplanned weight loss; exhaustion; low physical activity level; and slow walking speed. The study found that 4–10% of patients with HIV were frail, including up to 50% of patients over the age of 50 [5]. In the pre-ART era, there was a 10-fold increase in frailty in PLHIV compared to an HIV-negative population, but the prevalence of frailty in PLHIV halved with the introduction and use of ART [5]. In addition, low CD4+ T cell count and high HIV plasma RNA were associated with increased risk of frailty [5].

In the AGEhIV cohort study, PLHIV had a higher prevalence of frailty compared to HIV-negative individuals at all ages [6].

Frailty indexes specific to PLHIV have been established. The veterans ageing cohort study (VACS) developed a proxy FI that includes CD4+ T cell count, HIV viral load, hepatitis C co-infection, hepatic, renal and haematological markers, as well as d-dimer and soluble CD14, with the aim of predicting a mortality risk index in PLHIV [38]. The Modena HIV Metabolic Clinic developed a 37-item FI that includes HIV-related parameters to assess patients, and it has been found to be associated with multi-morbidity [39].

Higher rates of many co-morbidities that are associated with frailty occur in PLHIV compared to the general population, even adjusting for risk factors [40]. These co-morbidities include cardiovascular disease, metabolic disease, liver and kidney disease, osteoporosis and cancers. Frailty in PLHIV has been associated with increased falls, poorer functioning, decreased self-care, poor quality of life and depression, and neurocognitive impairment [4144].

In addition to differences caused by constitution and other co-morbidities, there may also be differences in the risk of developing frailty between older patients with recently acquired HIV, patients with chronic HIV infection effectively suppressed on therapy, and patients with late diagnosis, untreated chronic HIV.

Managing frailty in patients with HIV

Those treating HIV have become much more skilled in recognising and managing co-morbidity in PLHIV. There is now a need for further training so that HIV caregivers are equipped to recognise and manage ageing and frailty in this patient population as well.

Facilities for caring for those ageing with HIV, as well as those who have become frail, are currently quite variable in the levels of acceptance and comfort, and the ability to manage stigma and discrimination.

When managing frailty in PLHIV, physicians need to understand: when to intervene aggressively in the management of an older patient with a new HIV diagnosis to delay or prevent permanent debility and frailty; when to acknowledge that the patient has become frail; and the role of geriatric medicine in addressing the specific issues and needs of this patient such as maximising functional ability, preventing falls, reducing social isolation, and improving quality of life. The degree of frailty can fluctuate over time, which can complicate assessment of a patient.

There is a paucity of randomised clinical trial data on reversing frailty once it has been established. In the frailty interventions trial in elderly subjects (FITNESS) randomised controlled trial, simple measures such as randomised vitamin D supplementation and exercise over 10 weeks did not demonstrate improvements in self-reported physical health, physical performance, social activities or mental health [45].

A randomised multidisciplinary intervention over 12 months did significantly reduce frailty criteria and increased stability compared to controls, but did not impact on hospital admission, institutionalisation and death [46]. However, with 216 community participants, it was likely not powered to demonstrate these end points.

The comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) has been shown to be useful in managing elderly patients [47] and may be of benefit in patients with HIV with suspected frailty, even if they are below the usual geriatric age of 75 years.

There is variability in the evidence surrounding interventions that prevent frailty [48]. Epidemiological evidence suggests that interventions to assess and manage co-morbidities, reducing risk factors such as smoking, increasing exercise and optimising BMI, and improving personal and community resources, may reduce the risk of frailty [3034].

In patients with HIV, managing frailty is likely to require early introduction of newer ART to maintain CD4+ T cell count, together with lifestyle interventions and proactive management, to reduce the risk of co-morbidities.

Forum presentations

This report summarises presentations from the 2017 HIV innovation forum. Full speaker presentations can be accessed at http://www.innovationforum2017.com.au (password: HIVinnovation).

Abbreviations

ART: 

antiretroviral therapy

CGA: 

comprehensive geriatric assessment

CMV: 

cytomegalovirus

CRP: 

C-reactive protein

DHEA-S: 

dehydroepiandrosterone-sulphate

FI: 

frailty index

FITNESS: 

frailty interventions trial in elderly subjects

HbA1c: 

haemoglobin A1c

IGF-1: 

insulin-like growth factor-1

IL-6: 

interleukin-6

MACS: 

multicenter AIDS cohort study

TNF-α: 

tumour necrosis factor alpha

VACS: 

veterans ageing cohort study

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

MB wrote the first draft of the manuscript. A medical writer assisted with editing and formatting the manuscript. The author read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Associate Professor Ruth Hubbard for providing guidance and recommendations for this manuscript.

Competing interests

MB has received funding to his institution for clinical research from Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Bristol Myer-Squibb, Amgen, Novartis. MB has received funding for medical advisory boards or education and lecturing from Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, MSD, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Abbvie. MB has received funding for travel to scientific meetings from Gilead Sciences.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by Gilead Sciences. Gilead had no role in data collection, analysis or interpretation, and were not involved in the writing of this manuscript.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Holdsworth House Medical Practice, Darlinghurst, Level 3, 26 College St, Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia

References

  1. Sabin CA, Reiss P. Epidemiology of ageing with HIV: what can we learn from cohorts? AIDS. 2017;31(Suppl 2):S121–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Rasmussen LD, May MT, Kronborg G, Larsen CS, Pedersen C, Gerstoft J, et al. Time trends for risk of severe age-related diseases in individuals with and without HIV infection in Denmark: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Lancet HIV. 2015;2:e288–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Önen NF, Agbebi A, Shacham E, Stamm KE, Önen AR, Overton ET. Frailty among HIV-infected persons in an urban outpatient care setting. J Inf. 2009;59:346–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Petoumenos K, Huang R, Hoy J, Bloch M, Templeton DJ, Baker D, Giles M, Law MG, Cooper DA. Prevalence of self-reported comorbidities in HIV positive and HIV negative men who have sex with men over 55 years—the Australian positive & peers longevity evaluation study (APPLES). PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0184583.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Desquilbet L, Margolick JB, Fried LP, Phair JP, Jamieson BD, Holloway M, Jacobson LP, Multicenter ACS. Relationship between a frailty-related phenotype and progressive deterioration of the immune system in HIV-infected men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;50:299–306.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Kooij KW, Wit FW, Schouten J, van der Valk M, Godfried MH, Stolte IG, Prins M, Falutz J, Reiss P, Group AGCS. HIV infection is independently associated with frailty in middle-aged HIV type 1-infected individuals compared with similar but uninfected controls. AIDS. 2016;30:241–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Willig AL, Overton ET, Saag MS. The silent epidemic—frailty and aging with HIV. Total Patient Care HIV HCV. 2016;1:6–17.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013;381:752–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M146–56.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Mitnitski AB, Mogilner AJ, Rockwood K. Accumulation of deficits as a proxy measure of aging. Sci World J. 2001;1:323–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Searle SD, Mitnitski A, Gahbauer EA, Gill TM, Rockwood K. A standard procedure for creating a frailty index. BMC Geriatr. 2008;8:24.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Olde Rikkert MG. Visual estimation of biological age of elderly subjects: good interrater agreement. Gerontology. 1999;45:165–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan DB, McDowell I, Mitnitski A. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005;173:489–95.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Mitnitski A, Song X, Skoog I, Broe GA, Cox JL, Grunfeld E, Rockwood K. Relative fitness and frailty of elderly men and women in developed countries and their relationship with mortality. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:2184–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kulminski A, Yashin A, Arbeev K, Akushevich I, Ukraintseva S, Land K, Manton K. Cumulative index of health disorders as an indicator of aging-associated processes in the elderly: results from analyses of the national long term care survey. Mech Ageing Dev. 2007;128:250–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Romero-Ortuno R. The frailty instrument for primary care of the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe predicts mortality similarly to a frailty index based on comprehensive geriatric assessment. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2013;13:497–504.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hubbard RE, Woodhouse KW. Frailty, inflammation and the elderly. Biogerontology. 2010;11:635–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Deeks SG. HIV infection, inflammation, immunosenescence, and aging. Annu Rev Med. 2011;62:141–55.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Hunt PW. HIV and ageing: emerging research issues. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2014;9:302–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Hubbard RE, O’Mahony MS, Calver BL, Woodhouse KW. Plasma esterases and inflammation in ageing and frailty. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;64:895–900.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Li H, Manwani B, Leng SX. Frailty, inflammation, and immunity. Aging Dis. 2011;2:466–73.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Tu W, Rao S. Mechanisms underlying T cell immunosenescence: aging and cytomegalovirus infection. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:2111.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Fried LP, Xue QL, Cappola AR, Ferrucci L, Chaves P, Varadhan R, Guralnik JM, Leng SX, Semba RD, Walston JD, et al. Nonlinear multisystem physiological dysregulation associated with frailty in older women: implications for etiology and treatment. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009;64:1049–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sahin E, Depinho RA. Linking functional decline of telomeres, mitochondria and stem cells during ageing. Nature. 2010;464:520–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Leeansyah E, Cameron PU, Solomon A, Tennakoon S, Velayudham P, Gouillou M, Spelman T, Hearps A, Fairley C, de Smit V, et al. Inhibition of telomerase activity by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors: a potential factor contributing to HIV-associated accelerated aging. J Infect Dis. 2013;207:1157–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Veronese N, Stubbs B, Noale M, Solmi M, Pilotto A, Vaona A, Demurtas J, Mueller C, Huntley J, Crepaldi G, Maggi S. polypharmacy is associated with higher frailty risk in older people: an 8-year longitudinal cohort study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017;18:624–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Chowdhury R, Peel NM, Krosch M, Hubbard RE. Frailty and chronic kidney disease: a systematic review. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017;68:135–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Veronese N, Sigeirsdottir K, Eiriksdottir G, Marques EA, Chalhoub D, Phillips CL, Launer LJ, Maggi S, Gudnason V, Harris TB, Frailty and Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases in Older Persons. The age, gene/environment susceptibility-reykjavik study. Rejuven Res. 2017;20:517–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Newman AB, Gottdiener JS, McBurnie MA, Hirsch CH, Kop WJ, Tracy R, Walston JD, Fried LP, Cardiovascular Health Study Research G. Associations of subclinical cardiovascular disease with frailty. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M158–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hubbard RE, Searle SD, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. Effect of smoking on the accumulation of deficits, frailty and survival in older adults: a secondary analysis from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009;13:468–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kojima G, Iliffe S, Walters K. Smoking as a predictor of frailty: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2015;15:131.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Hubbard RE, Fallah N, Searle SD, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. Impact of exercise in community-dwelling older adults. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e6174.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Hubbard RE, Lang IA, Llewellyn DJ, Rockwood K. Frailty, body mass index, and abdominal obesity in older people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010;65:377–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lang IA, Hubbard RE, Andrew MK, Llewellyn DJ, Melzer D, Rockwood K. Neighborhood deprivation, individual socioeconomic status, and frailty in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57:1776–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Theou O, Brothers TD, Rockwood MR, Haardt D, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. Exploring the relationship between national economic indicators and relative fitness and frailty in middle-aged and older Europeans. Age Ageing. 2013;42:614–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Brothers TD, Kirkland S, Theou O, Zona S, Malagoli A, Wallace LMK, Stentarelli C, Mussini C, Falutz J, Guaraldi G, Rockwood K. Predictors of transitions in frailty severity and mortality among people aging with HIV. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0185352.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Onen NF, Agbebi A, Shacham E, Stamm KE, Onen AR, Overton ET. Frailty among HIV-infected persons in an urban outpatient care setting. J Infect. 2009;59:346–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Tate JP, Justice AC, Hughes MD, Bonnet F, Reiss P, Mocroft A, Nattermann J, Lampe FC, Bucher HC, Sterling TR, et al. An internationally generalizable risk index for mortality after one year of antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 2013;27:563–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Guaraldi G, Brothers TD, Zona S, Stentarelli C, Carli F, Malagoli A, Santoro A, Menozzi M, Mussi C, et al. A frailty index predicts survival and incident multimorbidity independent of markers of HIV disease severity. AIDS. 2015;29:1633–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Guaraldi G, Orlando G, Zona S, Menozzi M, Carli F, Garlassi E, Berti A, Rossi E, Roverato A, Palella F. Premature age-related comorbidities among HIV-infected persons compared with the general population. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53:1120–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Branas F, Jimenez Z, Sanchez-Conde M, Dronda F, Lopez-Bernaldo De Quiros JC, Perez-Elias MJ, Miralles P, Ramirez M, Moreno A, Berenguer J, Moreno S. Frailty and physical function in older HIV-infected adults. Age Ageing. 2017;46:522–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Brothers TD, Kirkland S, Guaraldi G, Falutz J, Theou O, Johnston BL, Rockwood K. Frailty in people aging with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. J Infect Dis. 2014;210:1170–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Guaraldi G, Malagoli A, Theou O, Brothers TD, Wallace L, Torelli R, Mussini C, Sartini S, Kirkland SA, Rockwood K. Correlates of frailty phenotype and frailty index and their associations with clinical outcomes. HIV Med. 2017;18:764–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Zamudio-Rodriguez A, Belaunzaran-Zamudio PF, Sierra-Madero J, Cuellar-Rodriguez JM, Crabtree-Ramirez B, Alcala-Zermeno JL, Amieva H, Avila-Funes JA. Association between frailty and HIV-associated neurodegenerative disorders among older adults living with HIV. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2018;34(5):449–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Latham NK, Anderson CS, Lee A, Bennett DA, Moseley A, Cameron ID, Fitness Collaborative G. A randomized, controlled trial of quadriceps resistance exercise and vitamin D in frail older people: the frailty interventions trial in elderly subjects (FITNESS). J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:291–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Cameron ID, Fairhall N, Langron C, Lockwood K, Monaghan N, Aggar C, Sherrington C, Lord SR, Kurrle SE. A multifactorial interdisciplinary intervention reduces frailty in older people: randomized trial. BMC Med. 2013;11:65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Ellis G, Langhorne P. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older hospital patients. Br Med Bull. 2004;71:45–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Puts MTE, Toubasi S, Andrew MK, Ashe MC, Ploeg J, Atkinson E, Ayala AP, Roy A, Rodriguez Monforte M, Bergman H, McGilton K. Interventions to prevent or reduce the level of frailty in community-dwelling older adults: a scoping review of the literature and international policies. Age Ageing. 2017;46:383–92.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement