Open Access

Role of sex hormones and the vaginal microbiome in susceptibility and mucosal immunity to HIV-1 in the female genital tract

AIDS Research and Therapy201714:39

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-017-0169-4

Received: 9 March 2017

Accepted: 11 August 2017

Published: 12 September 2017

Abstract

While the prevalence of Human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) infection has stabilized globally, it continues to be the leading cause of death among women of reproductive age. The majority of new infections are transmitted heterosexually, and women have consistently been found to be more susceptible to HIV-1 infection during heterosexual intercourse compared to men. This emphasizes the need for a deeper understanding of how the microenvironment in the female genital tract (FGT) could influence HIV-1 acquisition. This short review focuses on our current understanding of the interplay between estrogen, progesterone, and the cervicovaginal microbiome and their immunomodulatory effects on the FGT. The role of hormonal contraceptives and bacterial vaginosis on tissue inflammation, T cell immunity and HIV-1 susceptibility is discussed. Taken together, this review provides valuable information for the future development of multi-purpose interventions to prevent HIV-1 infection in women.

Keywords

HIV-1 susceptibility Mucosal immunity Female genital tract Sex hormones Microbiome

Background

Human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) infection remains one of the most serious health challenges in the world, and the fastest growing phase of this pandemic is currently by heterosexual transmission in women [1]. Adolescent girls and young women are at particularly high risk of HIV-1 infection, accounting for 20% of new HIV-1 infections globally. The gender imbalance is even more pronounced in geographical areas with higher HIV-1 prevalence, such as sub-Saharan Africa, where women account for almost 56% of the total number of people living with HIV-1 [1]. Although the female genital mucosa is a major portal for entry of HIV-1 into the body, responsible for initiation of 40% of global HIV-1 infections, the acute events that follow HIV-1 exposure in the female genital tract (FGT) still remain unclear [2].

The mucosal immune system of the female reproductive tract is one of the first lines of defense against incoming pathogens, but has also evolved to support an immunologically distinct fetus, a unique feature at this mucosal site. Female sex hormones estradiol and progesterone have marked immunoregulatory influence, coordinating immune cell phenotype and function and helping to regulate pregnancy and the menstrual cycle (reviewed in [3]). The FGT is compartmentalized between the lower and upper genital tract. The lower FGT consists of the vagina and the ectocervix, and is protected by a stratified squamous epithelium, which relies on the presence of multiple cell layers to provide a protective barrier. Conversely, the upper FGT consists of the endocervix, uterus, fallopian tubes and ovaries, and is lined by a monolayer of columnar epithelium. To support reproductive success, a pattern has evolved in which tissue specific aspects of innate, humoral and cellular immunity are either enhanced or suppressed in the upper and lower FGT, in coordination with hormonal fluctuations throughout the menstrual cycle. For example, during the progesterone-high secretory phase of the cycle, uterine cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity and natural killer (NK) cell cytotoxic activity are suppressed whereas innate components are enhanced. While the resulting immune changes optimize the environment for successful embryonic implantation in the upper FGT, they may also increase the risk of acquiring sexually transmitted infections (STIs) at this point in the menstrual cycle, known as a “window of vulnerability” (reviewed in [3, 4]).

Lying superficial to the epithelial cells of the vaginal tract is the microbiome, which exists in a symbiotic relationship with the female host. The current concept of a “healthy” vaginal microbiome includes a low-diversity, Lactobacillus rich environment. Four species of Lactobacilli (L. crispatus, L. gasseri, L. iners, and L. jensenii) are known to be the most common dominant species in the vaginal microbiome of 80–90% of Caucasian and Asian women, and 60% of Black and Hispanic women (reviewed in [5]). Although relatively stable throughout the rapid hormonal shifts of the menstrual cycle, the major hormonal shifts that occur at puberty and menopause significantly change the composition of the vaginal microbiome from mainly anaerobic bacteria to a vaginal microbiome dominated by species of Lactobacilli. Estrogen has been implicated in this shift, and a clear relationship between estradiol and colonization with Lactobacilli can be found in post-menopausal women on hormone replacement therapy, albeit via an imprecisely known mechanism.

Lactobacilli contribute to immunity in the FGT by providing non-specific defense against a broad range of pathogens (reviewed in [6]). They produce pH-modulating lactic acid and hydrogen peroxide, anti-microbial bacteriocins, and form adherent colonies on epithelial cells or cause co-aggregation between bacterial species, providing a physical/neutralizing barrier to protect against other harmful bacterial strains and pathogens. The ability of the host to tolerate Lactobacilli but protect against pathogenic bacteria relies on the bi-directional relationship that exists between the mucosal immune system and the microbiome [7, 8]. Culture-based studies have shown that commensal bacteria do not elicit cytokine release from vaginal epithelial cells, while pathogenic strains induce a strong pro-inflammatory response, likely via activation of epithelial toll-like receptors (TLRs) and interaction with cervical antigen presenting cells. The ability of vaginal bacteria to manipulate mucosal immunity and barrier properties has the potential to result in enhanced susceptibility to infection, particularly during a disturbance in the vaginal microbiome.

Despite the fact that the majority of HIV-1 infections in women occur as a result of heterosexual intercourse with an infected male partner, the precise mechanisms of sexual transmission in the FGT remain elusive. Heterosexual transmission models suggest that HIV-1 in the male ejaculate must first overcome numerous innate and adaptive immune factors in the vaginal lumen [9]. If successful, the virus will traverse through the genital epithelium via tears in the squamous epithelium or transcytosis across the single cell layer of the endocervix, ultimately infecting underlying CD4+ target cells in the submucosa. Here, the virus establishes a small founder population of productive infection that then expands systemically, likely via an influx of newly recruited target cells caused by an upregulation of chemokines [10]. Interestingly, studies show that in the majority of infected individuals only 1–3 virus variants are responsible for establishing productive infection in the newly infected partner [11]. There remains to be a clear consensus regarding (a) the primary location of HIV-1 entry in the FGT and (b) the etiology of epithelial penetration by HIV-1.

Although HIV-1 transmission can happen anywhere along the FGT, the columnar epithelium of the endocervix and transformation zone have been proposed as the favored sites for HIV-1 transmission, largely because it is composed of a single layer of cells with a thickness of only 10–30 μm, placing the virus in closer proximity to intraepithelial and submucosal target cells [9]. This is also the most immunologically active site in the FGT with relatively greater abundance of HIV-1 target cells: CD4+ T cells and macrophages [12]. Nevertheless, the squamous epithelium of the lower FGT is the primary area that comes in contact with seminal fluid containing infectious virus and comprises the majority of the exposed surface area of the FGT that would arguably present greater access sites for HIV-1 entry, particularly when breaches occur in the epithelium [13]. Together, these results suggest that genital tract acquisition of HIV-1 may take place at a variety of different tissues, and elucidating the mechanisms associated with the early events of HIV-1 infection in both the lower and upper FGT will prove valuable to the design of effective prophylactic therapeutics.

What is exceedingly clear is that increased mucosal inflammation enhances the rate of sexual transmission of HIV-1 in the FGT [10]. Recently, Masson et al. observed a threefold increased risk of HIV-1 infection in South African women who had elevated levels of at least five mucosal pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-8, IL-1β, IL-1α and TNF-α [14]. Our lab has shed light on the pathophysiological mechanism by which inflammation induced upon viral exposure can facilitate viral transmission [15, 16]. We showed that HIV-1 envelope protein gp120 interacts with TLR2 and TLR4 on the genital epithelium, resulting in the downstream induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, impairment of barrier function and significant viral translocation across the epithelium. However, the effects of inflammation on HIV-1 transmission extend beyond barrier disruption. Arnold et al. found increased frequencies of CD4+ T cells in the endocervix of women with pro-inflammatory cytokine profiles, which is relevant as HIV-1 preferentially infects CD4+ T cells, particularly T helper type 17 (Th17) CD4+ T cells and activated CD4+ T cells expressing α4β7 or α4β1 [17]. Indeed, an innate and adaptive inflammatory cascade in response to viral exposure in the FGT is necessary for the recruitment of target cells to the portal of entry and the establishment of a productive, systemic infection.

The vaginal microbiome can also influence susceptibility to HIV-1 via its intimate interaction with mucosal immunity in the vaginal tract. Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a symptomatic clinical condition diagnosed using the Nugent score or Amsel criteria, characterized by a polymicrobial vaginal microbiome and overgrowth of anaerobes. Although it has been consistently linked to increased risk of acquiring STIs including HIV-1 (reviewed in [5], [18]), it is becoming increasingly clear that bacterial diversity, even in the absence of BV might also confer greater susceptibility to disease [19, 20]. Pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in the vaginal fluid of women with BV are often upregulated, suggesting that BV and perhaps microbial diversity in the absence of BV may be capable of inducing sub-clinical inflammatory responses in the vaginal mucosa which could alter disease susceptibility. Diversity of the cervicovaginal microbiome has also been shown to be associated with changes in the vaginal proteome which might serve to physically disrupt the mucosal barrier [21]. Thus, BV, and likely microbial diversity are able to modify risk to STIs via their interaction with mucosal immunity within the FGT and modification of its protective epithelial barrier.

There is also emerging evidence that commonly used hormonal contraceptives may increase the risk of HIV-1 acquisition and transmission. Injectable progestins, including depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN), are the favored form of contraception used by approximately 8 million women in sub-Saharan Africa [22]. Although it remains controversial in the literature, numerous observational studies have identified DMPA as a significant risk factor for the acquisition of HIV-1. In a recent prospective cohort study, the HIV-1 incidence in South African women using DMPA and NET-EN was 2.93 times higher than the incidence in those not using long-term contraception [23]. While the biological mechanism remains unclear, women using injectable progestin-only contraceptives had 3.92 times the frequency of cervical CCR5+ CD4+ T cells compared to women not using long-term contraception who were in the naturally progesterone-high luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Disruption of the epithelial barrier, promotion of HIV-1 replication and transcytosis, suppression of innate and adaptive immune responses and changes in the vaginal microbiome are all additional proposed mechanisms through which DMPA may increase the risk of HIV-1 transmission (reviewed in [24]). To date, a few studies have attempted to elucidate the effect of hormonal contraceptives on the vaginal microbiome [21, 25, 26]. Some studies find subtle shifts and changes in women on hormonal contraceptives including enhancement of Lactobacillus species or reduction in total bacterial load, Gardnerella vaginalis and Lactobacilli [2528]. Others have demonstrated that the incidence of BV is decreased in women using both oral contraceptives and DMPA [2931]. While this may suggest that alterations in the vaginal microbiome is an unlikely explanation for the increased risk of HIV-1 acquisition in DMPA users, the effect of DMPA use on the vaginal microbiome has not been fully elucidated, and a comprehensive and well controlled assessment of the effect of hormonal contraceptives on the vaginal microbiome as it relates to HIV-1 susceptibility is still lacking. Given the accumulating evidence regarding safety of DMPA in women at high risk for HIV-1 acquisition, the World Health Organization has recently revised its guidelines to state that women can use DMPA but should be advised about the increased risk of HIV-1 acquisition and take steps to minimize their risk.

Thus a deeper understanding of the genital microenvironment, including cross talk between microbiome, female sex hormones, naturally-occurring and contraceptive containing synthetics, and the mucosal immune system could inform the use and development of (a) safer hormonal contraceptives and (b) sex-based vaccines against HIV-1. Future interventions for the prevention of HIV-1 infection could be gender-specific and multipurpose, combining vaccines with local probiotics or anti-inflammatory compounds to counter immune activation in the FGT. Curcumin [32] and glycerol monolaurate [33, 34] are examples of potential measures to counter immune activation in the FGT and may prove effective by decreasing target cell recruitment and the expansion of infected founder populations at the portal of entry. By increase vaginal Lactobacillus species and limiting tissue inflammation at the site of infection, these potential therapeutics in combination with an HIV-1 vaccine may enhance protection against the acquisition or spread of HIV-1 infection.

Conclusion

The FGT is a key target site for HIV-1 transmission in women, and the outcome of exposure to HIV-1 is likely determined by a number of factors that influence this mucosal microenvironment. It is unique among mucosal sites, challenged with the need to enable successful reproduction as well as mediate protection against sexually transmitted infections, such as HIV-1. Estrogen, progesterone, hormonal contraceptives and the vaginal microbiome are all factors within the microenvironment that participate in cross-talk with the immune system (Fig. 1). The net outcome of these interactions that results in an inflammatory microenvironment could be favorable for HIV-1 infection and replication by attracting target cells, which will subsequently become infected and further propagate the infection. The biological mechanisms underpinning the association between DMPA use or BV and increased HIV-1 susceptibility, although not conclusively established, likely rely on their ability to enhance mucosal inflammation and target cell recruitment within the female genital tract. A better understanding of the interplay between sex hormones, the vaginal microbiome and the immune system could inform strategies for development of multi-purpose interventions to prevent HIV-1 infection in women.
Fig. 1

The sex hormone-microbiome-immune system axis in the female genital tract (FGT). The hormonal milieu, consisting of estradiol and progesterone, regulates the vaginal microbiome and both these factors participate in cross-talk with the immune system in the FGT (blue), determining the level of innate inflammation in the genital tissue. Higher estrogen levels correlate with a vaginal microbiome dominated by Lactobacillus spp. which can decrease genital inflammation and reduce HIV-1 susceptibility (pink). Alternatively, the use of progestin-based contraceptives or the presence of BV can initiate an inflammatory cytokine microenvironment that attracts T cells and induce their activation (red). Elevated levels of CD4+ CCR5+ activated T cells in the tissue as a result of an inflammatory genital profile increases the risk of HIV-1 acquisition in women

Abbreviations

FGT: 

female genital tract

CTL: 

cytotoxic T lymphocyte

STIs: 

sexually transmitted infections

TLRs: 

toll-like receptors

Th17: 

T helper type 17

BV: 

bacterial vaginosis

DMPA: 

depo medroxyprogesterone acetate

NET-EN: 

norethisterone enanthate

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

DV, JMW, and CK wrote and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

None to declare.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by research grants from the Ontario HIV Treatment Network (OHTN) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). C.K. is the recipient of an Applied HIV Research Chair Award from the OTHN. D.V. is the recipient of the Ontario Graduate Scholarship (OGS). J.M.W. is the recipient of the Ontario Women’s Health Scholars Award.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster Immunology Research Centre, McMaster University
(2)
Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University

References

  1. UNAIDS: Global AIDS update 2016. Geneva: UNAIDS. 2016.Google Scholar
  2. Ferreira VH, Kafka JK, Kaushic C. Influence of common mucosal co-factors on HIV infection in the female genital tract. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2014;71:543–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wira CR, Rodriguez-Garcia M, Patel MV. The role of sex hormones in immune protection of the female reproductive tract. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15:217–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Wira CR, Fahey JV. A new strategy to understand how HIV infects women: identification of a window of vulnerability during the menstrual cycle. AIDS. 2008;22:1909–17.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Huang B, Fettweis JM, Brooks JP, Jefferson KK, Buck GA. The changing landscape of the vaginal microbiome. Clin Lab Med. 2014;34:747–61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Smith SB, Ravel J. The vaginal microbiota, host defence and reproductive physiology. J Physiol. 2017;595:451–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Sansonetti PJ. To be or not to be a pathogen: that is the mucosally relevant question. Mucosal Immunol. 2011;4:8–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ravel J, Brotman RM. Translating the vaginal microbiome: gaps and challenges. Genome Med. 2016;8:35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Carias AM, McCoombe S, McRaven M, Anderson M, Galloway N, Vandergrift N, Fought AJ, Lurain J, Duplantis M, Veazey RS, et al. Defining the interaction of HIV-1 with the mucosal barriers of the female reproductive tract. J Virol. 2013;87:11388–400.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Haase AT. Early events in sexual transmission of HIV and SIV and opportunities for interventions. Annu Rev Med. 2011;62:127–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Derdeyn CA, Decker JM, Bibollet-Ruche F, Mokili JL, Muldoon M, Denham SA, Heil ML, Kasolo F, Musonda R, Hahn BH, et al. Envelope-constrained neutralization-sensitive HIV-1 after heterosexual transmission. Science. 2004;303:2019–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Pudney J, Quayle AJ, Anderson DJ. Immunological microenvironments in the human vagina and cervix: mediators of cellular immunity are concentrated in the cervical transformation zone. Biol Reprod. 2005;73:1253–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hladik F, McElrath MJ. Setting the stage: host invasion by HIV. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:447–57.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Masson L, Passmore JA, Liebenberg LJ, Werner L, Baxter C, Arnold KB, Williamson C, Little F, Mansoor LE, Naranbhai V, et al. Genital inflammation and the risk of HIV acquisition in women. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61:260–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Nazli A, Chan O, Dobson-Belaire WN, Ouellet M, Tremblay MJ, Gray-Owen SD, Arsenault AL, Kaushic C. Exposure to HIV-1 directly impairs mucosal epithelial barrier integrity allowing microbial translocation. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1000852.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Nazli A, Kafka JK, Ferreira VH, Anipindi V, Mueller K, Osborne BJ, Dizzell S, Chauvin S, Mian MF, Ouellet M, et al. HIV-1 gp120 induces TLR2- and TLR4-mediated innate immune activation in human female genital epithelium. J Immunol. 2013;191:4246–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Arnold KB, Burgener A, Birse K, Romas L, Dunphy LJ, Shahabi K, Abou M, Westmacott GR, McCorrister S, Kwatampora J, et al. Increased levels of inflammatory cytokines in the female reproductive tract are associated with altered expression of proteases, mucosal barrier proteins, and an influx of HIV-susceptible target cells. Mucosal Immunol. 2016;9:194–205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Atashili J, Poole C, Ndumbe PM, Adimora AA, Smith JS. Bacterial vaginosis and HIV acquisition: a meta-analysis of published studies. AIDS (London, England). 2008;22:1493.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Anahtar MN, Byrne EH, Doherty KE, Bowman BA, Yamamoto HS, Soumillon M, Padavattan N, Ismail N, Moodley A, Sabatini ME, et al. Cervicovaginal bacteria are a major modulator of host inflammatory responses in the female genital tract. Immunity. 2015;42:965–76.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Gosmann C, Anahtar MN, Handley SA, Farcasanu M, Abu-Ali G, Bowman BA, Padavattan N, Desai C, Droit L, Moodley A, et al. Lactobacillus-deficient cervicovaginal bacterial communities are associated with increased HIV acquisition in young South African women. Immunity. 2017;46:29–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Borgdorff H, Gautam R, Armstrong SD, Xia D, Ndayisaba GF, van Teijlingen NH, Geijtenbeek TBH, Wastling JM, van de Wijgert JHHM. Cervicovaginal microbiome dysbiosis is associated with proteome changes related to alterations of the cervicovaginal mucosal barrier. Mucosal Immunol. 2016;9:621–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ross JA, Agwanda AT. Increased use of injectable contraception in sub-Saharan Africa. Afr J Reprod Health. 2012;16:68–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Byrne EH, Anahtar MN, Cohen KE, Moodley A, Padavattan N, Ismail N, Bowman BA, Olson GS, Mabhula A, Leslie A, et al. Association between injectable progestin-only contraceptives and HIV acquisition and HIV target cell frequency in the female genital tract in South African women: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:441–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Murphy K, Irvin SC, Herold BC. Research gaps in defining the biological link between HIV risk and hormonal contraception. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2014;72:228–35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Kazi YF, Saleem S, Kazi N. Investigation of vaginal microbiota in sexually active women using hormonal contraceptives in Pakistan. BMC Urol. 2012;12:22.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Mitchell CM, McLemore L, Westerberg K, Astronomo R, Smythe K, Gardella C, Mack M, Magaret A, Patton D, Agnew K, et al. Long-term effect of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate on vaginal microbiota, epithelial thickness and HIV target cells. J Infect Dis. 2014;210:651–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Brooks JP, Edwards DJ, Blithe DL, Fettweis JM, Serrano MG, Sheth NU, Strauss JF, Buck GA, Jefferson KK. Effects of combined oral contraceptives, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on the vaginal microbiome. Contraception. 2016;95(4):405–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Roxby AC, Fredricks DN, Odem-Davis K, Ásbjörnsdóttir K, Masese L, Fiedler TL, De Rosa S, Jaoko W, Kiarie JN, Overbaugh J, et al. Changes in vaginal microbiota and immune mediators in HIV-1-seronegative Kenyan women initiating depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;71:359–66.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Bradshaw CS, Vodstrcil LA, Hocking JS, Law M, Pirotta M, Garland SM, De Guingand D, Morton AN, Fairley CK. Recurrence of bacterial vaginosis is significantly associated with posttreatment sexual activities and hormonal contraceptive use. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:777–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. van de Wijgert JHHM, Verwijs MC, Turner AN, Morrison CS. Hormonal contraception decreases bacterial vaginosis but oral contraception may increase candidiasis. AIDS. 2013;27:2141–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Vodstrcil LA, Hocking JS, Law M, Walker S, Tabrizi SN, Fairley CK, Bradshaw CS. Hormonal contraception is associated with a reduced risk of bacterial vaginosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e73055.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Ferreira VH, Nazli A, Dizzell SE, Mueller K, Kaushic C. The anti-inflammatory activity of curcumin protects the genital mucosal epithelial barrier from disruption and blocks replication of HIV-1 and HSV-2. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0124903.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Haase AT, Rakasz E, Schultz-Darken N, Nephew K, Weisgrau KL, Reilly CS, Li Q, Southern PJ, Rothenberger M, Peterson ML, et al. Glycerol monolaurate microbicide protection against repeat high-dose SIV vaginal challenge. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0129465.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Li Q, Estes JD, Schlievert PM, Duan L, Brosnahan AJ, Southern PJ, Reilly CS, Peterson ML, Schultz-Darken N, Brunner KG, et al. Glycerol monolaurate prevents mucosal SIV transmission. Nature. 2009;458:1034–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement