Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of characteristics and conclusion of randomised controlled clinical trials using various regimens for TB prophylaxis in HIV

From: Current trends and intricacies in the management of HIV-associated pulmonary tuberculosis

Author

Cohort characteristics

Median CD4

Study design used in RCT

No. enrolled

Drugs used with dosages and duration

Duration of follow up

TB breakdown

Conclusion

Samandari et al. [53]

HIV infected With ART (47 %) if CD4 <200 cells/mm3

297

Double blind placebo controlled

1995 patients

Arm A 6 months INH 300 mg daily +30 months placebo

36 months

Arm A 1.26 %

Arm B-0.74 %

36 months INH was more effective but with greater toxicity

Arm B 6 months INH 300 mg daily +30 months INH daily

Swaminathan et al. [54]

HIV infected With/without ART

320

Open labelled

683 patients

Arm A 36 months of INH 300 mg daily

36 months

Arm A 1.6/100py

Arm B-2.4/100py

Statistically similar efficacy and toxicity with 6EH7 and 36 INH. Emergence of resistance was 0.8 %

Arm B-6 months of INH 300 mg and Ethambutol 800 mg daily

Martinson et al. [55]

HIV infected without ART and TST positive

484

Open labelled

1148 patients

Arm A Rifapentine (900 mg) plus INH (900 mg) weekly for 12 weeks, Arm B Rifampin (600 mg) plus INH (900 mg) twice weekly for 12 weeks, Arm C INH (300 mg) daily for up to 6 years (continuous isoniazid) Arm D INH (300 mg) daily for 6 months (control group).

Not specified

Arm A-3.1/100py Arm-B 2.9/100py Arm-C 2.7/100py Arm-D-3.6/100py

All regimens had equal efficacy w.r.t 6 months INH with toxicity more in the 3 years regimen. Emergence of resistance was 3.4 %

Sterling et al. [56] TBTC Study 26/ACTG 5259 [56]

HIV infected with 30 % on ART or close contact of TB cases

500

Open labelled

399 patients

Arm A 3 months of 900 mg (max) INH and 600–900 rifapentine once weekly Arm B 9 months of INH 300 mg daily

33 months

Arm A-0.39/100py

Arm-B 1.25/100py

Both regimens had equivocal efficacy but more toxicity in 9 months of INH