Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the changes in serum lipids following initiation of either Efavirenz or Atazanavir based regimens.

From: Serum lipid profiles among patients initiating ritonavir-boosted atazanavir versus efavirenz-based regimens

  

Mean

     

Continuous Lipid Outcome

ARV Group

Pre

Post

Unadjusted Post Difference

Model 1* Adjusted Difference

p-value

Model 2** Adjusted Difference

p-value

HDL-c (mg/dL)

EFV

39

46

Ref

Ref

 

Ref

 
 

Unboosted TAZ

39

42

-4

-3.92

0.003

-3.43

0.008

 

Boosted TAZ

38

41

-5

-4.12

<0.001

-4.00

<0.001

Non- HDL-c (mg/dL)

EFV

131

136

Ref

Ref

 

Ref

 
 

Unboosted TAZ

117

131

-5

-1.92

0.55

-1.08

0.73

 

Boosted TAZ

126

125

-11

-5.75

0.01

-4.57

0.04

TC/HDL

EFV

4.45

4.02

Ref

Ref

 

Ref

 
 

Unboosted TAZ

4.45

4.10

1.99

4.41

0.14

3.94

0.19

 

Boosted TAZ

4.10

3.97

-1.24

2.62

0.21

3.40

0.11

  

Prevalence

     

Binary Lipid Outcome

ARV Group

Pre

Post

Unadjusted Post Prevalence Ratio

Model 1* Adjusted Prevalence Ratio

p-value

Model 2** Adjusted Difference

p-value

HDL<40 (mg/dL)

EFV

52%

33%

Ref

Ref

 

Ref

 
 

Unboosted TAZ

55%

39%

1.18

1.05

0.79

1.01

0.95

 

Boosted TAZ

53%

42%

1.27

1.18

0.18

1.19

0.17

TC<200 (mg/dL)

EFV

74%

62%

Ref

Ref

   
 

Unboosted TAZ

85%

73%

1.18

1.07

0.59

1.05

0.71

 

Boosted TAZ

81%

78%

1.26

1.16

0.09

1.13

0.16

  1. * Adjusted for sex, race, age, history of chronic diseases, pre-initiation HDL and non-HDL cholesterol, CD4, HIV RNA, therapy, and follow-up time
  2. ** In addition to variables above, also adjusted for post-initiation CD4, HIV RNA, and type of NRTI backbone