Skip to main content

Table 3 Multivariable logistic regression analysis of being a never PrEP user compared to being a current PrEP user

From: PrEP-related stigma and PrEP use among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Ontario and British Columbia, Canada

Level of PrEP related stigma

OR

95%CI

p-value

aOR

95%CI

p-value

Never PrEP use vs. Current PrEP use* (n = 759)

Low (referent)

1

  

1

  

Intermediate

1.07

0.75–1.52

0.721

1.04

0.71–1.53

0.826

High

0.97

0.57–1.63

0.900

1.44

0.81–2.54

0.216

Former PrEP use vs. Current PrEP use† (n = 540)

Low (referent)

1

  

1

  

Intermediate

1.05

0.65–1.72

0.825

0.9

0.54–1.51

0.692

High

2.54

1.39–4.64

0.003

2.53

1.31–4.90

0.006

  1. CI: confidence interval. aOR: adjusted odds ratio. *Adjusted for: Number of sexual partners, PrEP indication and size of gay/bisexual/queer social network. † Adjusted for: Number of sexual partners and agreeing with the statement “Condoms are the only truly effective form of HIV prevention”