From: HIV diagnosis period influences ART initiation: findings from a prospective cohort study in China
 | Beta | SE (Beta) | P |
---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | |||
 Perceived severity | 0.35 | 0.13 | 0.009 |
 Time of HIV diagnosisa | 2.08 | 0.72 | 0.004 |
 Perceived severity * time of HIV diagnosis | − 0.36 | 0.17 | 0.038 |
Model 2 | |||
 Perceived susceptibility | 0.22 | 0.13 | 0.096 |
 Time of HIV diagnosis | 1.56 | 0.69 | 0.024 |
 Time of HIV diagnosis * perceived susceptibility | − 0.22 | 0.16 | 0.181 |
Model 3 | |||
 Perceived benefits | 0.49 | 0.15 | 0.002 |
 Time of HIV diagnosis | 3.06 | 0.81 | < 0.001 |
 Time of HIV diagnosis * perceived benefits | − 0.58 | 0.19 | 0.002 |
Model 4 | |||
 Perceived barriers | − 0.30 | 0.14 | 0.026 |
 Time of HIV diagnosis | − 0.29 | 0.53 | 0.581 |
 Time of HIV diagnosis * perceived barriers | 0.30 | 0.16 | 0.065 |
Model 5 | |||
 Self-efficacy | 0.31 | 0.12 | 0.011 |
 Time of HIV diagnosis | 1.34 | 0.51 | 0.008 |
 Time of HIV diagnosis * self-efficacy | − 0.24 | 0.16 | 0.131 |