Skip to main content

Table 3 Multiple logistic regression models for the association between HIV testing and four sexual risk behaviours (adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals in parentheses) in Edendale and Vulindlela, KwaZulu-Natal, survey period 2014 to 2016

From: Impact of HIV testing and treatment services on risky sexual behaviour in the uMgungundlovu District, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: a cross-sectional study

 

Survey 2014/2015

Survey 2015/2016

[1]a

Condom use last partnerb

[2]

Transaction sexc

[3]

Sex partners 12 mo.d

[4]

Condom use last partnerb

[5]

Transaction sexc

[6]

Sexual partners 12 mo. d

HIV tested (vs. did not test)

0.62*** (0.49–0.78)

0.62*** (0.50–0.77)

1.18 (0.89–1.55)

0.91 (0.72–1.14)

1.07 (0.78–1.48)

0.81 (0.65–1.02)

15–24 years (vs. 35–49 years)

0.66*** (0.54–0.81)

0.84 (0.68–1.04)

2.14*** (1.57–2.92)

1.00 (0.83–1.20)

0.98 (0.78–1.22)

1.79*** (1.43–2.24)

25–34 years (vs. 35–49 years)

1.06 (0.87–1.29)

1.12 (0.93–1.35)

1.90*** (1.40–2.57)

1.32** (1.10–1.58)

1.16 (0.95–1.42)

1.62*** (1.30–2.01)

Male (vs. female)

0.75*** (0.64–0.88)

0.79* (0.65–0.96)

7.01*** (5.53–8.88)

0.76*** (0.67–0.87)

0.96 (0.83–1.12)

4.62*** (3.93–5.44)

Married (vs. unmarried)

1.24*** (0.90–1.72)

0.66** (0.50–0.88)

0.23*** (0.13–0.41)

1.09 (0.86–1.39)

0.63*** (0.48–0.84)

0.36 (0.84–1.51)

Incomplete sec. school (vs. tertiary)

1.51* (1.07–2.14)

2.13*** (1.40–3.23)

0.70 (0.43–1.14)

1.29* (1.01–1.65)

1.05 (0.74–1.48)

1.12 (0.84–1.51)

Complete sec. school (vs. tertiary)

1.33 (0.96–1.85)

1.46 (0.96–2.20)

0.58* (0.38–0.90)

1.10 (0.87–1.39)

1.10 (0.80–1.51)

1.13 (0.85–1.49)

away > 1 mo. in previous year (vs. < 1mo. previous year)

1.21 (0.89–1.63)

1.29 (0.98–1.72)

0.94 (0.64–1.38)

0.92 (0.71–1.18)

0.93 (0.67–1.30)

1.62*** (1.27–2.07)

Highly food insecure (vs. food secure)

0.85 (0.68–1.06)

0.52*** (0.38–0.70)

1.31 (0.99–1.74)

0.87 (0.75–1.02)

0.50*** (0.36–0.70)

1.31** (1.08–1.61)

Moderate food insecure (vs. food secure)

1.04 (0.78–1.39)

0.75 (0.52–1.10)

1.26 (0.82–1.93)

0.78** (0.65–0.93)

0.48*** (0.33–0.70)

1.41*** (1.12–1.78)

Partner HIV positive (vs. don’t know partner status)

0.59*** (0.42–0.84)

–

–

1.06 (0.77–1.45)

–

–

Partner not HIV positive (vs. don’t know partner status)

1.11 (0.88–1.39)

–

–

1.23 (0.94–1.60)

–

–

Duration of last relationship (continuous)

1.03*** (1.01–1.05)

–

–

1.09*** (1.07–1.10)

–

–

Pseudo R2

0.05

0.04

0.20

0.07

0.03

0.17

n

7967

8271

6121

8860

8887

7819

  1. aThe numbers in the brackets refer to the multivariate regression model number ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05
  2. bCondom use with most recent sexual partner in the last 12 months (0 = consistent condom use/always used condoms; 1 = inconsistent condom use/sometimes or never used condoms)
  3. cEngaging in transactional sex (0 = not giving or receiving goods or money for sex in the previous year; 1 = have given or received goods or money for sex in the previous year)
  4. dNumber of sexual partners in the previous year (0 = 0 to 1 sexual partner in the previous year; 1 = 2 or more sexual partners in the previous year)
Back to article page

AIDS Research and Therapy

ISSN: 1742-6405

Contact us