Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of CD4 counts obtained by PIMA analyzer and the reference methods within different CD4 ranges

From: Utility of the point of care CD4 analyzer, PIMA, to enumerate CD4 counts in the field settings in India

CD4 Range (Cells/mm3)

N

Median CD4 Count (Range)* Cells/mm3

Mean relative bias (±2SD)

  

Reference Method

PIMA Analyzer

 

All

1790

356 (2–1726)

354 (6–1615)

−1% (−43, 42)

<250

508

165 (2–250)

168 (6–348)

−7% (−65, 51)

<350

877

228 (2–350)

225(6–542)

5% (−45,55)

251-350

369

298 (251–350)

299 (153–542)

−2% (−40, 36)

351-500

423

417 (351–500)

415 (213–676)

0% (−30, 30)

>500

490

648 (502–1726)

637 (179–1615)

5.1% (−23, 33)

  1. *: The differences between the median CD4 counts obtained by the one of the reference methods and the PIMA analyzer was statistically insignificant for all CD4 ranges (P > 0.05).