Table 5 Final logistic regression model that predict adherence to dose, time and food in JUSH, Southwest Ethiopia, 2009.
Variables | Adherence | Crude OR (95% CI) | P-value | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Adhered N (%) | Non Adhered N (%) | Â | Â | Â | Â |
WHO stage | Â | Â | Â | 0.01 | Â | 0.13 |
I | 4(33.3%) | 8(66.7%) | 0.26(0.07-0.96) | Â | 0.17(0.042-1.18) | Â |
II | 56(71.8%) | 22(28.2%) | 1.31(0.62-2.74) | Â | 1.19(0.54- 2.56) | Â |
III | 134(77.5%) | 39(22.5%) | 1.76(0.91-3.41) | Â | 1.35(0.67- 2.72) | Â |
IV | 37(66.1%) | 19(33.9%) | 1.00 | Â | 1.00 | Â |
Average family income Tertile | Â | Â | Â | 0.03 | Â | 0.10 |
Lowest | 64(69.6%) | 28(30.4%) | 1.00 | Â | 1.00 | Â |
Middle | 88(71.0%) | 36(29.0%) | 1.04(0.20-0.93) | Â | 1.07(0.58-1.98) | Â |
Highest | 70(77.8%) | 20(22.2%) | 1.53(0.23-0.98) | Â | 1.60(0.80-3.20) | Â |
Getting family support | Â | Â | Â | 0.01 | Â | 0.01 |
No | 147(78.6%) | 40(21.4%) | 1.00 | Â | 1.00 | Â |
Yes | 84(63.6%) | 48(36.4%) | 0.48(0.29-0.78) | Â | 2.12(1.25-3.59) | Â |
Sex | Â | Â | Â | 0.03 | Â | 0.18 |
Male | 113(78.5%) | 31(21.5%) | 1.76(1.06-2.93) | Â | 0.70(0.41-1.20) | Â |
Female | 118(67.4%) | 57(32.6%) | 1.00 | Â | 1.00 | Â |