Author, name of the trial, if any/year/published? | Design | Comparison | N | Follow-up (weeks) | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monteiro et al. [36]/2013/Yes | Observational | RAL + ETV | 25 | 48 | -91% virologically suppressed in per-protocol analysis |
 |  |  |  |  | -Lipids improved |
Ward et al. [26]/2013/No | Observational | Switching for toxicity concerns to a RAL + 1 or 2 agents, most commonly on RAL + ATV/r with or without ETV or MVC | 62 | 168 | -92% virologically suppressed; |
 |  | -3 of 15 on dual therapy had to add third agent for low-level viremia | |||
Calin et al. [27]/2013/No | Observational | Switching to RAL + ETV regimen | 91 | 48 | -93% had viral load <50 copies/mL |
 |  |  |  |  | -4/5 with virological failures had past NNRTI mutations |
 |  |  |  |  | -3 patients had RAL mutations |
Katlama et al. [28], ROCnRAL/2013/No | Single-arm exploratory trial | R5-trophic suppressed patients switched to MVC + RAL | 41 | 48 | -Failure in 11.4% |
 |  | -RAL mutations in 3/5 patients who failed | |||
 |  |  | -1/5 had R5 to ×4 virus switch | ||
Cotte et al. [29], No Nuc No Boost/2013/No | Single-arm exploratory trial | MVC + RAL | 10 | 48 | -No virological failures (>50 copies/mL) |
 |  |  | -No serious adverse event | ||
Burgos et al. [30]/2012/No | Observational | Switching for toxicity concerns to a PI/r + 2nd agent, many with no NRTI | 131 | 56 | - > 90% virologically suppressed. |
Ofotokun et al. [31], KITE/2012/No | Exploratory pilot trial | (i) LPV/r + RAL; (ii) standard ART | 60 | 48 | -92% in arm (i) and 88% in arm (ii) with viral load <50 copies/mL; |
 |  |  |  |  | -Higher triglycerides in arm (i) |
 |  |  |  |  | -No difference in BMD or body composition. |
Carey et al. [32], SPARTA/2012/Yes | Pilot cross-over RCT | Patients receiving ATV/r randomized to: (i) ATV/r (300/100 mg respectively once daily) + RAL (800 mg once daily) | 25 | 76% in follow-up for 48 weeks | -Both agents pharmacologically compatible. |
(ii) ATV (300 mg twice daily) + RAL (400 mg twice daily) | -All patients remained virologically suppressed | ||||
Cordery et al. [35]/2010/Yes | Observational | RAL + ATV (unboosted) | 20 | 72 | -Only 1 (5%) failure |
Allavena et al. [33]/2009/Yes | Observational | Switching for toxicity concerns to a PI/r + RAL. | 29 | 48 | -100% virologically suppressed |
Fischl et al. [34]/2007/Yes | RCT, not fully powered | (i) LPV/r + EFV; | 236 | 96 | -Arm (i): shorter time to failure or discontinuation; |
(ii) EFV + NRTIs | |||||
 |  |  |  |  | -Arm (i): greater increase in triglycerides |