Open Access

Late presentation increases risk and costs of non-infectious comorbidities in people with HIV: an Italian cost impact study

  • Giovanni Guaraldi1Email author,
  • Stefano Zona1,
  • Marianna Menozzi1,
  • Thomas D. Brothers2,
  • Federica Carli1,
  • Chiara Stentarelli1,
  • Giovanni Dolci1,
  • Antonella Santoro1,
  • Ana Rita Domingues Da Silva4,
  • Elisa Rossi5,
  • Julian Falutz3 and
  • Cristina Mussini1
AIDS Research and Therapy201714:8

DOI: 10.1186/s12981-016-0129-4

Received: 28 April 2016

Accepted: 7 December 2016

Published: 16 February 2017

Abstract

Background

Late presentation (LP) at the time of HIV diagnosis is defined as presentation with AIDS whatever the CD4 cell count or with CD4 <350 cells/mm. The objective of our study was to assess the prevalence of non-infectious comorbidities (NICM) and multimorbidity among HIV-positive individuals with and without a history of LP (HIV + LP and HIV + EP, respectively), and compare them to matched HIV-negative control participants from a community-based cohort. The secondary objective was to provide estimates and determinants of direct cost of medical care in HIV patients.

Methods

We performed a matched cohort study including HIV + LP and HIV + EP among people attending the Modena HIV Metabolic Clinic (MHMC) in 2014. HIV-positive participants were matched in a 1:3 ratio with HIV-negative participants from the CINECA ARNO database. Multimorbidity was defined as the concurrent presence of ≥2 NICM. Logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate associated predictors of NICM and multimorbidity.

Results

We analyzed 452 HIV + LP and 73 HIV + EP participants in comparison to 1575 HIV-negative controls. The mean age was 46 ± 9 years, 27.5% were women. Prevalence of NICM and multimorbidity were fourfold higher in the HIV + LP compared to the general population (p < 0.001), while HIV + EP present an intermediate risk. LP was associated with increased total costs in all age strata, but appear particularly relevant in patients above 50 years of age, after adjusting for age, multimorbidity, and antiretroviral costs.

Conclusions

LP with HIV infection is still very frequent in Italy, is associated with higher prevalence of NICM and multimorbidity, and contributes to higher total care costs. Encouraging early testing and access to care is still urgently needed.

Keywords

HIV Late presentation Comorbidities Costs

Background

The World Health Organization defines “late presentation” (LP) as a new HIV diagnosis with concurrent acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) defining events, whatever the CD4+ T cell count, or else a new human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) diagnosis with CD4+ count less than 350 cells/mm3 [1, 2]. LP is associated with adverse outcomes, including shorter life expectancy [35], and may also impair the efficacy and tolerability of combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) [4, 6]. Although most HIV-positive individuals who begin therapy with a CD4+ count above 200 cells/mm3 eventually achieve a CD4+ count >500 cells/mm3, those with LP are far less likely to ever experience a robust CD4+ cell gain [7]. LP has also been associated with enhanced risk for drug toxicities including anemia [8] and immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) [9]. Approximately 40–60% of new HIV diagnoses in Italy are made in the context of LP [10]. The Collaboration of Observational HIV Epidemiological Research Europe (COHERE) study observed a small decrease in LP across Europe from 57.3% in 2000 to 51.7% in 2010/11, suggesting that the prevalence of LP remains stubbornly high over time [5].

Older age represents a consistent risk factor for LP [1114], as a result of barriers to HIV testing among older adults at the individual, medical and public health policy levels [15, 16]. With an increasing number of people being diagnosed with HIV at an older age, the association between older age and LP is becoming even more significant and it is important to understand how LP might affect the health of people aging with HIV.

Nevertheless, it is still unknown whether there is an association between LP and age-related non-infectious co-morbidities (NICM) among people living with HIV, including cardiovascular disease (CVD), hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and osteopenia/osteoporosis. These heterogeneous comorbidities recognize age and HIV disease as independent risk factors, and tend to aggregate into complex multimorbidity (MM) patterns (usually defined as two or more NICM being present in the same individual at the same assessment).

The objective of our study was to assess the prevalence of NICM and MM among HIV-positive individuals with and without a history of LP, and compare them to matched HIV-negative control participants from a community-based cohort. The secondary objective was to provide estimates and determinants of direct cost of medical care in LP HIV patients.

Methods

The study took place at the multidisciplinary Modena HIV Metabolic Clinic (MHMC), which was initiated in 2004 to assess longitudinal metabolic changes among people with HIV. As previously described [17, 18], patients undergo annual comprehensive assessments in multiple domains, including metabolic and endocrinological variables, bone mineral density (BMD), organ function, and social factors.

In the past 10 years a gradual decline in LP was observed in people attending MHMC, similar to that found in other European countries [5, 14, 19]. In 2004 LP prevalence in our cohort was 87%, while in 2012 it was 65% of the new patients.

The current cross-sectional study was performed using data from two groups of individuals with visits to the MHMC in 2014. One group were all patients identified with a history of LP at the time of HIV diagnosis (HIV + LP). The other were all patients without a history of LP, and were therefore early presenters (HIV + EP). LP was defined according to the WHO definition, as a new HIV diagnosis with concurrent AIDS defining events, whatever the CD4+ T-cell count, or else a new HIV diagnosis with CD4+ count less than 350 cells/mm3 [1, 2].

HIV + LP and HIV + EP participants were each matched in a 1:3 ratio, on age, sex, and race (all Caucasian) and geographical area of origin, to participants in a community-based cohort of the general population, the CINECA ARNO database [18]. The ARNO Observatory is an on-line, multi-centre observational database in which population-based data is collected and epidemiological methods [20] are used to combine and aggregate large volumes of health and healthcare-related data for each individual patient. These data include primary care provider-generated medication prescriptions, inpatient hospital records and discharge, summaries, diagnostic laboratory tests and radiographic examinations. This information is linked to other sources of patient data (including vital statistics and patient demographics) in order to provide comprehensive tracking of clinical diagnoses and healthcare use trends throughout Italy. Lifestyle, anthropometric and metabolic data are not collected in the CINECA ARNO database. All CINECA ARNO participants included in this study did not have a diagnosis of HIV infection, and were therefore assumed to be HIV negative.

Outcomes

NICM diagnoses were based according the following criteria previously used in our studies [18]. The category of CVD included the following diagnoses: myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, stroke, angina pectoris, coronary artery bypass grafting, and angioplasty. Among MHMC participants, diagnostic criteria for hypertension, T2DM, and CKD included, respectively, blood pressure measurements >140/90 mmHg over two consecutive measurements, fasting serum glucose levels >126 mg/dL and eGFR <60 ml/min using the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) estimating equation [21]. Drug tracing criteria used to establish hypertension and T2DM diagnoses in both cohorts included current use of antihypertensive and hypoglycemic drugs. In the HIV-positive groups only we analyzed low bone mineral density (t-score <−2SD) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Direct healthcare cost assessments

The cost of care analysis is referred to the economic point of view of the Italian public healthcare system, which offers drugs and health assistance free of charge to any HIV-positive patients. Direct healthcare costs were retrospectively analyzed in the calendar year 2013, as previously described [22] using the following indicators:

  1. 1.

    Hospital costs

    Hospitalization costs were calculated by collecting International Classification of Diseases, ninth edition (ICD9) codes in both cohorts. All hospitalization with a primary or secondary ICD-9 diagnosis codes including CVD, hypertension, T2DM, bone fractures, and renal failure diagnosis were selected [23] (Additional file 1: Table S1).

     
  2. 2.

    Outpatient HIV medical care cost

    With the movement of HIV care into the outpatient setting, it is not possible to evaluate the total cost of medical care using ICD9 codes. For outpatient cares we attributed a mean patient care cost obtained by the most recent reference value, which was able to better define HIV related care cost in patient with cART. This estimate is adjusted for current CD4 count strata, accounting 1381 USD/year for patients with CD4 <75 cell/mmc, 1241 USD/year for 76 < CD4 < 200 cell/mmc and 190 USD/year for CD4 > 201 cell/mmc [24] (Additional file 1: Table S1).

     
  3. 3.

    NICM medication costs

    NICM medication costs were calculated using pharmaceutical tracing by average wholesale prices obtained by National Pharmaceutical Prontuary of Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA) [25].

     
  4. 4.

    cART medication costs

    cART medication cost were calculated using pharmaceutical tracing, by average hospital-sale price.

     

We converted hospital cost and outpatient HIV medical care cost from USDs to euros using conversion rate at the 31th of December, 2014 [26]. Total cost was defined as the sum of mean of NICM-costs plus mean of HIV-hospitalization costs plus mean of drug costs.

Statistical analysis

Comparisons among groups were performed using χ2 test for categorical variables with Bonferroni adjusted post hoc analyses (significance level fixed at p < 0.017) and T-test or Mann–Whitney U-test for normally and non-normally distributed continuous variables, respectively. The probability of MM was drawn in the three comparative groups across age distribution using a logistic model. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to determine factors associated with LP using general population as reference after correction for sex and age (in years).

Considering the non-normal distribution of total costs, generalized linear models were constructed to evaluate independent factors associated with total cost in the whole population and in the subgroup of HIV-infected patients, using inverse Gaussian family distribution.

The variables for regression analyses were chosen on the basis of their clinical relevance.

Statistical analyses were performed STATA Software package, Intercooled version 13 for Mac (StataCorp ltd, Collage Station, TX, USA).

Results

525 individuals presented to the MHMC with new HIV diagnosis in 2014: 452 (85%) were HIV + LP and 73 (15%) were HIV + EP. These HIV-positive MHMC participants were matched to 1575 HIV-negative CINECA ARNO participants. Overall mean age was 46 ± 9 years and 27.5% were women, being the same across study groups per matching criteria.

With regards to HIV patients all the HIV + LP were on ART regimen, while 30.3% of HIV + EP had not yet started ARV.

Table 1 shows descriptive characteristics of the sample and their association with HIV + LP in comparison to HIV + EP.
Table 1

Demographic, anthropometric and metabolic characteristics associated with late presentation

 

All HIV + Patients (n = 525)

HIV + LP (n = 452)

HIV + EP (n = 73)

OR (95% CI)

p value

Men (n)

381 (72.5%)

319 (71.2%)

60 (82.2%)

0.59 (0.28–1.00)

0.050

Age (mean, SD)

46 (±9)

46 (±8)

43 (±10)

1.03 (1.01–1.08)

0.010

Current CD4 (n/microL) (median, IQR)

590 (441–756)

570 (423–729)

750 (589–981)

0.997 (0.996–0.998)

<0.001

Smoke

 None

318 (60.6%)

282 (62.4%)

36 (49.3%)

1 (ref.)

 <10 cigs (moderate)

76 (14.4%)

63 (14.0%)

13 (17.8%)

0.61 (0.31–1.23)

0.173

 >10 cigs (intense)

99 (18.9%)

84 (18.6%)

15 (20.6%)

0.71 (0.37–1.37)

0.311

 Missing

32 (6.1%)

23 (5.1%)

9 (12.3%)

Not included

 

BMI (kg/m2) (SD)

24.7 (±4.7)

24.7 (±4.7)

24.8 (±4.7)

0.99 (0.94–1.05)

0.891

Waist circompherence (cm) (SD)

89.1 (±12)

89.2 (±12)

88.6 (±12)

1.08 (0.98–1.03)

0.467

Lipodystrophy

 No lipodystrophy

184 (35.0%)

144 (31.9%)

40 (54.8%)

1 (ref.)

 Lipoatrophy

129 (24.6%)

112 (25.0%)

16 (21.9%)

1.96 (1.04–3.68)

0.036

 Fat accumulation

212 (40.4%)

195 (43.1%)

17 (23.3%)

3.18 (1.73–5.84)

<0.001

Cardiovascular and metabolic

 Triglycerides (mg/dL) (medican, IQR)

142 (95–207)

143 (96–209)

127 (93–185)

1.00 (0.99–1.00)

0.494

 Total cholesterol (mg/dL) (mean, SD)

198 (±45)

197 (±45)

197 (±43)

1.00 (0.99–1.00)

0.929

 HDL (mg/dL) (mean, SD)

46 (±14)

46 (±14)

47 (±16)

0.99 (0.98–1.00)

0.645

 LDL (mg/dL) (mean, SD)

117 (±33)

117 (±33)

119 (±33)

0.99 (0.99–1.00)

0.710

 Glucose (mg/dL) (mean, SD)

94 (±19)

95 (±21)

90 (±10)

1.03 (1.01–1.05)

0.011

 HOMA (median, IQR)

2.4 (1.4–3.8)

1.9 (1.2–2.9)

1.9 (1.2–3.0)

1.29 (1.09–1.54)

0.003

NICM prevalence are reported in Fig. 1. A trend in higher prevalence of any NICM was observed in HIV + LP participants. With regard to MM the difference in prevalence reached significant levels when comparing HIV- and HIV + EP with HIV + LP (respectively p < 0.001 and p < 0.001), being present in 11% in HIV + LP, 4% in HIV + EP and 3% in HIV-negative controls, respectively.
Fig. 1

NICM and MM prevalence distribution across study groups

According to our study hypothesis we explored the probability of NICM and MM across age distribution using a logistic model in the three comparative groups. CVD, T2DM and MM were significantly higher in HIV + LP when compared to both HIV + EP and HIV-negative participants (p < 0.01 for all comparisons) (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Age-related risk probability for CVD, T2DM and MM

No difference was found in hypertension risk across age distribution in the three groups.

CKD and low BMD data were not available for comparison in the HIV-negative group, but a non-significant trend in higher prevalence was observed in HIV + LP when compared to HIV + EP, respectively 7.52 vs. 4.11%, p = 0.291 and 20.13 vs. 12.33%, p = 0.147.

In multivariable models including age and sex, we observed fourfold increased odds of MM in HIV + LP participants compared to HIV-negative individuals (OR 4.3, 95% CI 2.8–6.7, p < 0.001). On the contrary, HIV + EP was not a risk factor for MM when compared to HIV-negative (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.4–5.5, p = 0.503) (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Multivariable logistic regression model to detect independent predictors of MM in the cohort

With regards to our secondary objective we estimated NICM related costs, HIV outpatient costs and cART costs in the 3 patient groups. Additional file 1: Figure S1 describes total costs across age strata and Fig. 4 also stratify HIV patients in EP and LP.
Fig. 4

Total and cART costs of medical care in HIV negative, HIV + EP and HIV + LP across age strata (mean)

A multivariable logistic regression was built to predict total cost in the whole population including clinically significant covariates (Table 2).
Table 2

Independent predictors of total cost in the whole population

 

β-coeff

95% CI

p value

HIV + EP vs. HIV−

1400

422–2380

0.005

HIV + LP vs. HIV−

3246

2233–4260

<0.001

Multimorbidity

6578

6049–7107

<0.001

Age

53

41–64

<0.001

Sex

 Women

0 (Ref)

 Men

114

−106 to 334

0.309

ART

5606

4602–6610

<0.001

A second linear regression model was built to identify independent predictors of total cost in HIV-infected patients only. Predictors of total cost in cases were: LP (β, 2994; CI 1561–4427, p < 0.001); MM (β, 7818; CI 5653–9985, p < 0.001); age (β, 150; CI 87–212, p < 0.001); current CD4 count < 200 (β, 2723; CI −270 to 5716, p = 0.075); male sex (β, 281; CI −865 to 1427, p = 0.630); protease inhibitors (PIs) exposure in months (β, 33; CI 6–60, p = 0.015).

Discussion

Data from MHMC cohort study show that individuals with late presentation for HIV diagnosis (HIV + LP) exhibit an increased risk for age-related NICM and MM compared to individuals with early presentation for HIV diagnosis (HIV + EP) and matched HIV-negative individuals sampled from the general population. This difference translates into increased total costs of medical care in all age strata, but appear particularly relevant in patients above the age of 50. Therefore, LP influences both clinical and economical outcomes.

At any age, the risk for individual NICM as well as MM was fourfold higher in HIV + LP compared to people without HIV, while HIV + EP had an intermediate risk.

Our results should be interpreted with caution, in particular with regard to reproducibility of our results in different HIV settings. It could be argued that the tertiary referral setting of the MHMC may concentrate patients with higher prevalence of NICM and MM, however the prevalence of these conditions has previously been demonstrated to be similar between local MHMC attendees and those referred from other centers [18]. In Italy, people with HIV have full free access not only to cART but also to clinical care including diagnostic procedures with no co-pay. This might result in a selection bias as screening activities are offered relatively more frequently to individuals with HIV than the general population, which might result in higher rates of incidentally identified asymptomatic disease. The information available in the CINECA-ARNO administrative database limited further comparisons in rates of NICM diagnoses, as not all major risk factors for NICM are collected and clinical assessments are not provided. Moreover, with regard to CKD, the number of clinical events was very limited and BMD measurements were not available in CINECA cohort. Furthermore, the HIV + EP group is relatively small. Finally, the cross-sectional design of our study cannot prove causality regarding the impact of LP on NICM or MM risk, nor we were able to collect biomarkers of systemic and tissue inflammation to argue a pathogenic link between LP and these outcomes.

The total cost of medical care was higher in HIV-positive participants than in the general population in any age strata. Higher costs was, as expected, mainly attributable to antiretroviral drugs costs, especially PIs [2729]. Of interest, total and ART costs for the HIV + EP group aged less than 40 years is much lower than the other HIV + EP strata. This can be explained with the fact that 30.3% of these patients were not on ART, following WHO 2013 guidelines [30].

Notably NICM-related care costs contributed significantly to the higher cost burden of HIV-infected patients in the context of LP.

These findings reinforce what has already been suggested by Krentz and Gill, that early initiation of ART may result in a cost-saving intervention [24]. Conversely, increasing age and concurrent MM represent a good indicator of increased total cost.

We believe that, in a demographic setting, particularly in a resource-rich setting, in which the majority of HIV-infected patients are older than 50 years, total care cost will continue to increase [28, 31, 32].

These results suggest that, in the absence of targeted HIV prevention and diagnostic campaigns, the proportion of HIV+/LP will continue to increase, which will increase the burden of higher MM-related clinical and economic costs. In light of the unmistakable message recently provided by the strategic timing of antiretroviral therapy (START) study [33], which demonstrated a beneficial effect of immediate antiretroviral therapy for both serious AIDS-related and serious non–AIDS-related events, we can hope a reduction of the proportion of HIV + LP with a reduction in the burden and cost of comorbidities.

In conclusion, LP with HIV infection remains very common today in Italy and is associated with higher NICM and MM which is associated with higher total care costs. Promoting early testing and access to care is still urgently needed.

Abbreviations

AIDS: 

acquired immuno deficiency syndrome

AIFA: 

Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco

BMD: 

bone mineral density

cART: 

combined anti retroviral therapy

CKD: 

chronic kidney disease

COHERE: 

collaboration of observational HIV epidemiological research Europe

CVD: 

cardio vascular disease

DXA: 

dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

EP: 

early presentation

HIV: 

human immunodeficiency virus

HIV + EP: 

HIV-positive patients with early presentation

HIV + LP: 

HIV-positive patients with late presentation

ICD-9: 

international classification of diseases, ninth edition

IRIS: 

immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome

LP: 

late presentation

MDRD: 

modification of diet in renal disease

MHMC: 

Modena HIV metabolic clinic

MM: 

multi morbidity

NICM: 

non infectious comorbidities

START: 

strategic timing of antiretroviral therapy

T2DM: 

type 2 diabetes mellitus

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

GG, SZ, FC, CS carried out the field work. SZ, MM carried out the statistical analysis. GG, SZ, GD prepared the manuscript. GG, SZ, FC, CS, MM prepared the study design. CM was guarantor of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the patients who attend the Metabolic Clinic. Without them this publication would not be possible.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Approval for the MHMC Cohort was obtained from the Research Ethics Board of the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, and all participants provided written consent.

Funding

This study is supported by ‘Co-morbidity in relation to AIDS’ Grant agreement (305522), European Union Seventh Framework. Thomas Brothers was supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research Summer Research Studentship.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Adults and Children, Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
(2)
Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University
(3)
McGill University Health Center
(4)
Infectious Disease Department, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo
(5)
Health Care Department, Cineca-Interuniversity Consortium

References

  1. Antinori A, Coenen T, Costagiola D, Dedes N, Ellefson M, Gatell J, et al. Late presentation of HIV infection: a consensus definition. HIV Med. 2011;12:61–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. World Health Organization. Anti retroviral therapy for HIV infection in adults and adolescents. Recommendations for a public health approach: 2010 revision. http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/arv/adult2010/en/ 13 Dec 2015.
  3. Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort Collaboration. Life expectancy of individuals on combination antiretroviral therapy in high-income countries: a collaborative analysis of 14 cohort studies. Lancet. 2008;372:293–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Sterne JAC, May M, Costagliola D, de Wolf F, Phillips AN, Harris R. Timing of initiation of antiretroviral therapy in AIDS-free HIV-1-infected patients: a collaborative analysis of 18 HIV cohort studies. Lancet. 2009;373:1352–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Mocroft A, Lundgren JD, Sabin ML, d’Arminio MA, Brockmeyer N, Casabona J. Risk factors and outcomes for late presentation for HIV-positive persons in Europe: results from the collaboration of observational HIV epidemiological research Europe study (COHERE). PLoS Med. 2013;10:1001510.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Op de Coul EL, van Sighem A, Brinkman K, van Benthem BH, van der Ende ME, Geerlings S. Factors associated with presenting late or with advanced HIV disease in the Netherlands, 1996–2014: results from a national observational cohort. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e009688.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Kelley CF, Armstrong WS. Update on immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome: progress and unanswered questions. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2009;11:486–93. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19857389.
  8. Sullivan PS, Hanson DL, Chu SY, Jones JL, Ward JW. Epidemiology of anemia in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected persons: results from the multistate adult and adolescent spectrum of HIV disease surveillance project. Blood. 1998;91:301–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Shelburne SA, Visnegarwala F, Darcourt J, Graviss EA, Giordano TP, White ACJ, et al. Incidence and risk factors for immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome during highly active antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 2005;19:399–406.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Girardi E, Aloisi MS, Arici C, Pezzotti P, Serraino D, Balzano R. Delayed presentation and late testing for HIV: demographic and behavioral risk factors in a multicenter study in Italy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;36:951–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Zoufaly A, van der Heiden M, Marcus U, Hoffmann C, Stellbrink H, Voss L, et al. Late presentation for HIV diagnosis and care in Germany. HIV Med. 2012;13:172–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bai F, Tincati C, Merlini E, Pacioni C, Sinigaglia E, Carpani G. Reduced central memory CD4+ T cells and increased T-cell activation characterise treatment-naive patients newly diagnosed at late stage of HIV infection. AIDS Res Treat. 2012;2012:314849.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. de Olalla PG, Manzardo C, Sambeat MA, Ocana I, Knobel H, Humet V, et al. Epidemiological characteristics and predictors of late presentation of HIV infection in Barcelona (Spain) during the period 2001–2009. AIDS Res Ther. 2011;8:22.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. d’Arminio Monforte A, Cozzi-Lepri A, Girardi E, Castagna A, Mussini C, Di Giambenedetto S, et al. Late presenters in new HIV diagnoses from an Italian cohort of HIV-infected patients: prevalence and clinical outcome. Antivir Ther. 2011;16:1103–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Deblonde J, De Koker P, Hamers FF, Fontaine J, Luchters S, Temmerman M. Barriers to HIV testing in Europe: a systematic review. Eur J Public Health. 2010;20:422–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mensforth S, Goodall L, Bodasing N, Coultas J. Late diagnosis among our ageing HIV population: a cohort study. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17:19692.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Guaraldi G, Orlando G, Murri R, Vandelli M, De Paola M, Beghetto B, et al. Quality of life and body image in the assessment of psychological impact of lipodystrophy: validation of the Italian version of assessment of body change and distress questionnaire. Qual Life Res. 2006;15:173–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Guaraldi G, Orlando G, Zona S, Menozzi M, Carli F, Garlassi E, et al. Premature age-related comorbidities among HIV-infected persons compared with the general population. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53:1120–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Vives N, Carnicer-Pont D, Garcia de Olalla P, Camps N, Esteve A, Casabona J. Factors associated with late presentation of HIV infection in Catalonia Spain. Int J STD AIDS. 2012;23:475–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. CINECA ARNO observational database. https://osservatorioarno.cineca.org 9 Aug 2014.
  21. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation modification of diet in renal disease study group. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:461–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Guaraldi G, Zona S, Menozzi M, Carli F, Bagni P, Berti A, et al. Cost of noninfectious comorbidities in patients with HIV Clinicoecon. Outcomes Res. 2013;5:481–8.Google Scholar
  23. International classification of diseases (ICD): 9th revision, basic tabulation list with alphabetic index. Geneva: World Health Organization;1978. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd9.htm.
  24. Krentz HB, Gill MJ. Cost of medical care for HIV-infected patients within a regional population from 1997 to 2006. HIV Med. 2008;9:721–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA)]. http://www.agenziafarmaco.gov.it/5 Mar 2015.
  26. Banca d’Italia—Cambi di riferimento del 31 dicembre 2014. https://www.bancaditalia.it/compiti/operazioni-cambi/cambio/cambi_rif_20141231.
  27. Bozzette SA, Joyce G, McCaffrey DF, Leibowitz AA, Morton SC, Berry SH, et al. Expenditures for the care of HIV-infected patients in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:817–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gebo KA, Fleishman JA, Conviser R, Hellinger J, Hellinger FJ, Josephs JS, et al. Contemporary costs of HIV healthcare in the HAART era. AIDS. 2010;24:2705–15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Magoni M, Scarcella C, Vassallo F, Lonati F, Carosi G, Castelnuovo F, et al. The evolving burden of HIV infection compared with other chronic diseases in northern Italy. HIV Med. 2011;12:129–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. WHO. Consolidated ARV guidelines. 7.1.1 When to start ART in adults and adolescents. 2013. http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/guidelines/arv2013/art/statartadolescents/en/.
  31. Luther VP, Wilkin AM. HIV infection in older adults. Clin Geriatr Med. 2007;23:567–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mandalia S, Mandalia R, Looo G, Chadborn T, Sharott P, Youle M, et al. Rising population cost for treating people living with HIV in the UK, 1997–2013. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:15677.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. INSIGHT START study group. Initiation of antiretroviral therapy in early asymptomatic HIV infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement