Therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole: a case report of multiple drug interactions in a patient with an increased CYP2C19 activity
© Bouatou et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 7 April 2014
Accepted: 15 July 2014
Published: 4 August 2014
Voriconazole is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 and CYP 3A4. Drug-drug interactions and genetic polymorphisms modulate their activities.
A 35-year old African female patient with resistant HIV and a cerebral mass of unknown origin was treated with voriconazole for a suspicion of disseminated Aspergillosis infection. Voriconazole trough concentrations (C0) were within target range while the patient was under esomeprazole, a CYP2C19 inhibitor. Phenotyping showed decreased CYP2C19 activity, whereas genotyping showed a variant allele associated with increased enzyme activity. The patient was switched to ranitidine because of the introduction of atazanavir. CYP3A4 inhibition by atazanavir combined with uninhibited CYP2C19 activity resulted in subtherapeutic voriconazole C0. The reintroduction of esomeprazole allowed restoring voriconazole C0 back to target range.
The integration of drug-drug interactions and pharmacogenetics data is crucial to interpret drug concentrations correctly, thus preventing suboptimal exposure to voriconazole.
KeywordsDrug interaction Pharmacogenetics Individualization Therapeutic drug monitoring CYP antifungal
Voriconazole is used as an antifungal agent in the treatment of suspected or known Aspergillosis infection. Voriconazole is mainly metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 and 3A4, and its clearance is modulated by drug – drug interactions (DDI)[3, 4] and genetic polymorphisms[5–7]. We report a case of multiple DDI in a patient with an increased CYP2C19 activity that led to variations in voriconazole trough concentrations (C0). Voriconazole C0 reached and stayed within the targeted range with the use of inhibitors of CYP2C19 and CYP3A4.
A 35-year old Cameroonian female was diagnosed with AIDS (CDC stage C3) in May 2012. A duodenal histoplasmosis and cryptococcosis infection were treated from June 2012 with a 3-week course of amphotericin B – flucytosine followed by oral voriconazole 100 mg bid. A combined antiretroviral regimen (cART) was initiated (emtricitabine, tenofovir and raltegravir). As she developed a single large intracranial mass, voriconazole was given intravenously and doses were increased up to 4 mg/kg/12 h. A cerebral biopsy showed aspecific inflammatory infiltrates with-T lymphocytes, negative gram stain and broad range PCR. As the lesion was associated with a voluminous edema, she was started on IV dexamethasone (3 mg tid) progressively tapered over 1 month. The proton pump inhibitor (PPI) esomeprazole 40 mg bid was started because of severe epigastralgia associated with duodenal histoplasmosis.
Due to several HIV resistance mutations and hepatitis B status, cART was modified with the addition of abacavir in order to increase cerebral penetration of unboosted atazanavir together with maintenance of emtricitabine/tenofovir. Atazanavir absorption depends on gastric acidity. The patient was switched from esomeprazole to the histamine-2 receptor antagonist ranitidine, which is less potent in suppressing intragastric pH.
Several voriconazole C0 were then measured below the therapeutic range despite substantial increased dosing (Figure 1). Darunavir - ritonavir regimen was introduced because of therapeutic failure and atazanavir was stopped. The patient presented with new onset epigastralgia and anemia. Ranitidine was replaced by esomeprazole 40 mg IV bid. Three days later, voriconazole C0 increased 14-fold and the voriconazole dose was reduced by 50% (2.5 mg/kg bid). There were no other medication changes. Subsequent voriconazole C0 stayed within the therapeutic range. However the patient’s condition deteriorated as she developed progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. She eventually died four months later.
CYP2C19 activity is modulated both by genetic polymorphisms and drug – drug interactions. Our patient was heterozygous for CYP2C19*17. Its frequency is approximately 21% in Caucasians, 16% in African-Americans, and 3% in Asians. This allele is associated with increased enzymatic activity and may decrease voriconazole exposure compared to homozygous wild type extensive metabolizers[7, 9]. CYP2C19 phenotype was performed under high doses of esomeprazole, a CYP2C19 inhibitor. It explains the reduced enzymatic activity despite the patient’s genotype. Voriconazole C0 was within the therapeutic range when associated with the proton pump inhibitor. It was subtherapeutic when the patient received ranitidine, which has no influence on CYP activity and voriconazole concentrations. Atazanavir is a CYP3A4 inhibitor. Hence voriconazole clearance depended only on uninhibited CYP2C19. When atazanavir was stopped, boosted darunavir was introduced. Ritonavir is a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor and can lead to increased voriconazole concentration. However repeated administration of ritonavir induces CYP2C19 metabolic activity and potentially causes a reduction in voriconazole exposure. The magnitude of the effect depends on the dose administered. The net effect of low dose ritonavir and inhibition of CYP2C19 by high-dose esomeprazole is likely to be a decrease in enzyme metabolic activity.
After esomeprazole was reintroduced, the patient was taking both a CYP2C19 and a CYP 3A4 inhibitor, and voriconazole plasma levels reached therapeutic concentrations.
Double blockade of voriconazole metabolic pathways (CYP2C19 and CYP3A4) led to concentrations within the therapeutic range in a patient genetically susceptible to subtherapeutic voriconazole concentrations. This case illustrates how the integration of drug-drug interactions and pharmacogenetics can help interpret drug concentrations during therapeutic drug monitoring, and thus minimize the risk of suboptimal exposure to voriconazole. The “boosting strategy” is mainly used in the fields of HIV therapeutics with antiretroviral drugs such as ritonavir or cobicistat and its efficacy to overcome specific CYP genotypes has not been evaluated so far.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.
No research funding was received for the submitted work. The data were generated as part of our routine work.
- Herbrecht R, Denning DW, Patterson TF, Bennett JE, Greene RE, Oestmann JW, Kern WV, Marr KA, Ribaud P, Lortholary O, Sylvester R, Rubin RH, Wingard JR, Stark P, Durand C, Caillot D, Thiel E, Chandrasekar PH, Hodges MR, Schlamm HT, Troke PF, de Pauw B, : Voriconazole versus amphotericin B for primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis. N Engl J Med. 2002, 347 (6): 408-415.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mikus G, Schöwel V, Drzewinska M, Rengelshausen J, Ding R, Riedel KD, Burhenne J, Weiss J, Thomsen T, Haefeli WE: Potent cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype-related interaction between voriconazole and the cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor ritonavir. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006, 80 (2): 126-135.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dolton MJ, Ray JE, Chen SC, Ng K, Pont LG, McLachlan AJ: Multicenter study of voriconazole pharmacokinetics and therapeutic drug monitoring. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012, 56 (9): 4793-4799.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aouri M, Decosterd LA, Buclin T, Hirschel B, Calmy A, Livio F: Drug interactions between voriconazole, darunavir/ritonavir and etravirine in an HIV-infected patient with Aspergillus pneumonia. AIDS. 2012, 26 (6): 776-778.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mikus G, Scholz IM, Weiss J: Pharmacogenomics of the triazole antifungal agent voriconazole. Pharmacogenomics. 2011, 12 (6): 861-872.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee S, Kim BH, Nam WS, Yoon SH, Cho JY, Shin SG, Jang IJ, Yu KS: Effect of CYP2C19 Polymorphism on the Pharmacokinetics of Voriconazole After Single and Multiple Doses in Healthy Volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 2011Google Scholar
- Dolton MJ, McLachlan AJ: Clinical importance of the CYP2C19*17 variant allele for voriconazole. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011, 71 (1): 137-138.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scott SA, Sangkuhl K, Gardner EE, Stein CM, Hulot JS, Johnson JA, Roden DM, Klein TE, Shuldiner AR: Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines for cytochrome P450-2C19 (CYP2C19) genotype and clopidogrel therapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011, 90 (2): 328-332.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scott SA, Sangkuhl K, Shuldiner AR, Hulot JS, Thorn CF, Altman RB, Klein TE: PharmGKB summary: very important pharmacogene information for cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily C, polypeptide 19. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2012, 22 (2): 159-165.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bosilkovska M, Clément M, Dayer P, Desmeules J, Daali Y: Incorporation of Flurbiprofen in a 4-Drug Cytochrome P450 Phenotyping Cocktail. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2014Google Scholar
- Boyd NK, Zoellner CL, Swancutt MA, Bhavan KP: Utilization of omeprazole to augment subtherapeutic voriconazole concentrations for treatment of Aspergillus infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012, 56 (11): 6001-6002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Purkins L, Wood N, Kleinermans D, Nichols D: Histamine H2-receptor antagonists have no clinically significant effect on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of voriconazole. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003, 56 (Suppl 1): 51-55.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abel S, Russell D, Taylor-Worth RJ, Ridgway CE, Muirhead GJ: Effects of CYP3A4 inhibitors on the pharmacokinetics of maraviroc in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008, 65 (Suppl 1): 27-37.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu P, Foster G, Gandelman K, LaBadie RR, Allison MJ, Gutierrez MJ, Sharma A: Steady-state pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of voriconazole and ritonavir in healthy male subjects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007, 51 (10): 3617-3626.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.